Anonymous ID: 99e53d Jan. 27, 2019, 12:40 a.m. No.4925684   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5688 >>5689

Regarding the FBIAnon posts on halfchan tonight, it is good to remember, the original FBIAnon attempted to push people toward Jerome Corsi.

 

Can we consider this credible, in light of that reminder?

Anonymous ID: 99e53d Jan. 27, 2019, 12:48 a.m. No.4925729   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5745 >>5748

>>4925716

Not like there was a book written by the original FBIAnon either.

 

And if indeed Corsi 'were' on to a few things, as it was suggested, then he (corsi) would have been arkancided by now and we both know it (a would the original FBIAnon) so no, larp. sorry.

Anonymous ID: 99e53d Jan. 27, 2019, 12:51 a.m. No.4925748   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4925729

>>4925716

 

However, it MUST be noted that there are concrete predictions made this time.

 

So, it may be totally legit - but I mostly bring up thsi reminder to temper expectations.

 

Too much black pilling going on because larpers make predictions (or shitty decodeing anons do) and then when nothing happens, well, you see the results.