What do you think, anons?
It sounds like you already know the answer.
You don't seem to know you're just feeding it, though.
Exactly. I was hoping someone had an idea.
For whatever reason, this fire reminded me of that original top half of the picture which an anon crafted in a side by side thread.
Then I remembered Q had posted about "lighting a fire to flush them out".
We did find out James had a connection to either Maggie Nixon or that Sunshine girl that crashed in that plan in Scottsdale, remember?
This appears to be a new trend with the faggot shills.
This baker attacking is meant to divide us. The BV took the bait a few days ago and they've been attacking the chink in the armor relentlessly.
Quit taking the bait.
Do you remember which girl James had a connection to?
I believe it was an Instagram picture where he was standing next to the girl in question's mother.
Can someone follow this back and point me to where I can get that Instagram picture or maybe link me to the thread we were talking about this in?
If it helps, we were talking about the Y head, owl head, or whatever symbolism that connects to the bloodlines and about how they use it to identify each other at the time. The combination of the two brought in some really annoying shills. I think it was one day last week.
No reason to jeopardize family or close friendships.
You got the wrong message when you were told to go an red pill people.
Learn to play the game again.
We were already told many of them would run again to avoid judicial repercussions.
Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly.
But, I recall James standing with his arm around something close to a middle aged woman leaned forward a bit. There were also two or three other people in the photo who all had their arms around each other's shoulders or hips.
Anons had connected this image to Maggie "Sunshine" or Maggie Nixon (Wendy). I don't remember which girl, but I do remember that there was plenty of confusion (shills, most likely) that day as to whether or not Maggie Nixon was also Maggie "Sunshine". Anon then reminded everyone that Maggie Nixon can be seen in a blue (purple, maybe) dress in recent Instagram photos where she was at some sort of gathering for these types of people.
I hope that helps.
You are suppose to avoid the label.
When it comes up, agree and amplify.
This SHOULD NOT BE DONE though. You shouldn't be revealing these kinds of things to people you love personally. We're suppose to redpill people indirectly.
Why do I say that? It's simple: they'll need you when they learn these truths. You're to be there for them when the time comes and offer answers to their questions. You're suppose to be the calm DURING THE STORM.
Take to Twitter and meme factories. Learn the trade. Develop your skills and disperse information like you've been told.
Going to your close family members or friends who have yet to see light and dumping this shit on them is unfair. You took time to let these things grow with you. It's not fair for you to dump all that truth on them like that. It will break their mind and they'll resent you for it.
You have to be subtle if you're going to deal with in person and personal pilling. If you just dump shit on them, you're doing it wrong.
It's been posted many times, anon.
I don't claim to understand the extent of the conversation you've had.
But you need to be sure to avoid resentment. If they resent you, they likely won't come to you for help. They will feel shame for being confronted with the truth, turning a blind eye to it, and letting it cause a divide in your relationship.
It would take a strong will to avoid these things happening.
Because of this, you're told to let them come to terms with things on their own. Did someone come to you and dump all of this on you, or did you learn it all by yourself, slowly, and through a few year's time?
Dumping it all on them in the past few months and seeing things accelerate like they are doing now could potentially cause trauma. Such a hurried paradigm shift like that could be bad for them, and it's obvious that this is the reason why Q/POTUS and /ourguys/ haven't just sent out a live broadcast, opened up a database, and said, "here's the truth. if you want to better understand what's happening right now, go through all of this as soon as possible and you'll know you're safe etc."
Doing so would be quite a lot for people to handle.
This is why they must realize what's happening on their own and see you be there for them when the time is right.
Of course, I occupy but one perspective. There's a chance I've misinterpreted things, too. Maybe you just haven't seen all of the things I've seen, though…
If that hasn't happened to you, you probably aren't trying.
If she came to you, I suppose that's fair.
Like the other anon said, when you mentioned "salvaging friendships" I felt obligated to warn you, and hopefully someone else that's considering things.
Anon I'm glad you thought what I was discussing early was notable, but that wasn't exactly finished. >>4928280
Myself and other anons discussed the missing link that needed to be incorporated (or at least we're guessing that it may be the link we're missing) here >>4928430 >>4928554 >>4928582 >>4928607 >>4928625