>>4935403 pb

>https://www.adl.org/resources/reports/quantifying-hate-a-year-of-anti-semitism-on-twitter#qanon

Thanks anon, for posting this hit piece on Q and anti-semiticism. I just got finished compiling anti-Q articles for January 2019; this one makes 21.

It was inevitable that Q group would get attacked for anti-Semitic stuff on this board. It's already been done by WaPo and their minions (see 12-10-18 article; just search on '"hateful conspiracies"). One group cited in that article, Network Contagion Research Institite''', has been analyzing QResearch memes and finds them racist (see cap).

A lot of material on this WaPo "hateful conspiracies" article was posted last month; search on them in the QResearch archive for moar: www. https://www.resignation.info/scripts/8chan/search.php

>>>>4936300

pb

>https://www.adl.org/resources/reports/quantifying-hate-a-year-of-anti-semitism-on-twitter#qanon

Thanks anon, for posting this hit piece on Q and anti-semiticism. I just got finished compiling anti-Q articles for January 2019; this one makes 21.

It was inevitable that Q group would get attacked for anti-Semitic stuff on this board. It's already been done by WaPo and their minions (see 12-10-18 article; just search on '"hateful conspiracies"). One group cited in that article, Network Contagion Research Institite''', has been analyzing QResearch memes and finds them racist (see cap).

A lot of material on this WaPo "hateful conspiracies" article was posted last month; search on them in the QResearch archive for moar: www. https://www.resignation.info/scripts/8chan/search.php

Thx for the heads-up. I want to put out the Jan list, but on Feb 1, so I get all the Jan articles. I one mentioned LB was new; we may see a few moar by Jan. 31.

There is already a version I put out at the end of December. Here it is, found it: >>4592014. Just capped it, so I can find it again.

>>4936538

the REPLY is on the bottom, accidentally included the whole darn message in it.

>>4936321

>>4936337

>>4936350

>>4936403

>>4936480

Part of the reason to "track (((them))) tracking us" is to see what they're up to, so it can be countered in various ways.

One way is to point out the obvious: that this is an OPEN BOARD. Anyone can post.

Another is to discredit their fake research methods. And they ARE fake. They do a lot of suggestiing that correlation equals causation, for example (If I watch Alex Jones, I must believe everything he says).

All these researchers claim to be trying to "protect" the gullible public from "extreme" ideas. But who's going to protect us from THEIR extreme ideas?

One of the reasons that the DIGG on Hamilton68 (etc) is such a big deal is that there seems to be an awfully big group of people and orgs claiming to do "counter-intelligence" on Russian influence on the web.

What they are really doing is counter-intelligence on conversatives and other non-conformists in the name of combatting Russian influence.

I know, anons, this is not news to any of you. But they have been working hard to convince the public of this–and seem to have literally MILLIONS of dollars to help them do this. See recent post on TDIP, which just got $50mil from 7-10 undisclosed "private donors" to "track Russian disinfo networks" before the 2018 elections. >>4898043 pb

>>4936656

Frens, try subbing out "conservatives" for "conversatives" (although I rather like the idea of being a "conversative")

>>4936661

Yes, muh jooz stuff is a problem but I do not assume that it's anons and comp'd bakers who are the problem. The shills push VERY hard on this, as you must know. They sometimes come up with plausible-sounding reasons this material is of value. They will never listen to your worthwhile arguments, anon.

>>4936696

>why we even have a research board

Because we do a lot of excellent research here. It's like gold-mining: lots of fool's gold with a little bit of the real stuff. We have to pan for it!

>>4936734

Look, fren, I am interested in truth and only truth. Not an apologist for any group that is DS. At the same time, think of how very difficult it is on this particular board to have any sort of intelligent discussion about why the Jewish question arises and why such discussions are so much more prevalent than other urgent questions.

I finally concluded that–whatever the truth is–this is not the appropriate time to focus on that question. Because Israel and all the questions that surround it are not first in line according to Q. And since this is QResearch, I try to align my diggs with that in mind.

>>4936757

Thoughtful post, thx.