>>493751

The big problem with this is that the code doing the searching has to run on the server because that's where the database files are that hold the posts. As such, searching would put an enormous demand on the servers - much more than they could feasibly handle. To move the load off the server, we'd have to have verbatim copies of every post in another location that was able to handle the load. It's really not a matter of writing the code; lots of people can do that. It's a question of getting access to the data to search, and having the CPU power to run the searches.

>>493362

Scrunchies is a viable possibility, as most become 3' wide after a single use and wouldn't even hold molasses because the netting is too stretched out.

I wonder if we know what people want us to know ... and only when they want us to know it. It seems to be the case.

>>493881

It still takes a long time to load one thread at a time. In peak times we fill one in 40 minutes.

>>493877

Very doable … IF we had direct READ-ONLY access to the (presumably) SQL data files holding that data. I could do the rest, as many others could as well.

>>493887

Not to sound too harsh, but that is a LOT of what can't be done and why. CA is a horrible state to live in on every level. Find solutions. Dig. Get creative. Sometimes things are not so easy or comfortable. That doesn't mean they're not doable.

>>493919

Yep. I'm the first one to agree that such a resource would be PRICELESS and would go a LONG way toward increasing our effectiveness on every front. My suggestion: keep pushing for this. A solution will be found; a way to make it work. Don't let the idea die on the vine. We need this. Ultimately it would probably be Codemonkey's decision, but considering the importance of Q, I'm sure we could make it reality one way or another.

>>482489

What happened at the Olympics on 2/23?

>>493974

It's a work in progress. If you knew the scale of things being worked on, you might be amazed that so much has been accomplished so quickly. There is no way to make this easier than it is for people - yet. Too much just has to be kept out of the public eye, for now. You see the often violent emotional resistance we get just from SUGGESTING that the Parkland (LARPland) shooting was not entirely legitimate. Imagine if bigger things were suddenly thrust on people. Case in point: the HR1865 issue floating around here today. Everybody is crying out but who has even read the bill to see what's in it? I rest my case.

>>494037

Welcome to the ever-changing world of the Mandela Effect.

>>494264

HTML is bad; JSON is worse. Run-time compile of very verbose instructions that make it very nice for the developer but are hell on the server's execution time.

>>494457

Okay in the case of JSON, "labels" not "instructions" but you get the idea. It has to be interpreted.

Something else isn't adding up here … if you start shooting up a school, and especially if you take the time to hit 31 people (17 dead, 14 more injured), how on God's green Earth are you going to be able to leave the school? You just walk out, when half the kids in school called 911 the second it started? Unless they really were told it was a drill so the would not call the cops. Still … only 4 deputies outside? I lived 3 miles from Columbine when it happened and I remember cop after cop zooming down Bowles Avenu toward the school at something like 70 mph, when the state law said there were too many wrecks so emergency vehicles could only travel 35 mph. Within 3 minutes of the shooting starting, no living human would have made it 10 feet from that building without being apprehended. But in this case, Cruz decided he wanted a hamburger; shooting all those people makes a kid hungry after all. So he wanders off to Mickey D's, no problem.

>>494539

This just keeps getting worse.

>>494539

And then all those kids are just going to let him walk out, no problem. "Oh look, he put his guns down and he's changing, okay let's just let him leave, maybe he won't hurt anybody else."