>>493018
I agree with >>493069. POTUS needs to hear all sides. We are all here because we have and do support Trump. However, many of us are not blind followers who automatically trust everything he says or does. I was among those that repeatedly "complained" about the original 20% disclosure level. Was that needles complaining? No. It got us to 40%, which I think is still far too low. Trump himself has said that he trusts no one. I believe there is a story that he instructed his young children to trust no one. Then he asked them who do they trust. When they responded "I trust you daddy," Trump would reply "what did I just tell you." I think Trump does and should expect the same from us. When he gave us the signal that he hears us, imo that means he also wants to hear the dissent, not just the cheerleading.
This type of discussion is just as important as the digging. In fact, I think it is more important than the digging, because, let's face it, Q has already told us many times that POTUS has it all. Q has us digging for our own sake, and to find info for spreading memes, not to uncover information for POTUS that will crack the case open.
Many aspects I do not trust. Could go on and on. One specific aspect is the whole trust the military, trust the NSA. I trust Admiral Rogers, but ask yourself why he had to "play the game." Is everyone else there trustworthy? This whole revelation that Snowden is a bad actor from the CIA is a nice spy story, and is probably true, but it does not change the fact that the NSA, not the CIA developed the illegal mass surveillance system, and then lied to Congress about it. Nobody went to. No punishment, no law and order. So, everybody kept doing it. BTW, has anybody heard about the Dennis Montgomery scandal? Will we be told he was also a CIA plant? What if he was? That would not change what went on at the NSA. Montgomery showed that the NSA tools were weaponized for blackmail against politicians, judges, and justices. There also was some information about big fat bank accounts held offshore under stolen identities. Not sure how that worked. Did Admiral Rogers know this? Will we be told, or are these "state secrets." Wouldn't you want to know if a Supreme Court justice had been blackmailed to throw a decision, maybe one like the "surprise" 5-4 decision in favor of Obamacare? I would. Does all of this mean that I do not trust the NSA at all. No, of course not. However, the pumping up of the NSA relative to Snowden and the CIA is starting to reach low level propaganda for my tastes.