>>493212
I agree, and we need to point out the manipulative name and PERSONAL responsibility or those of Law Enforcement, not the vendors. It would be like all bakeries having to shut down because only Hostess could afford the potential lawsuits
Anyone besides me wish Q would have been a liddle clearer about the House Resolution or their plans sneaking this shit in while they were rope a doping us by killing kids?! Just blowing off steam, because this is not a lot of time to get the word out and set the record straight.
Something like "While they were threatening your 2nd Amendment rights, they were stealing your 1st Amendment rights and disguising it as Anti Trafficking…" "What large Social Media Companies support this to crush their competition?"
I didn't even realize I typed that. I am mildly afraid it was typed for me or I am lost to conditioning. Crap.
I am really pissed off I didn't know about this HR and the posined Pill it means for us or for the President. Why is is his job not to sign it and catch all the heat, thanks to the naming. What a bullship deal. All politicians fear us, so of course they will sponsor it. And they also fear the "look" of visibly NOT responding to trafficking. Common people will not look at the contents or what it means. They will buy the name in a drive by and that will be that for everyone.
Former Navy Captain…?
All you lightbulb and other folks enjoy your last days of LARPing freedom. The sliders and shills are dancing in the street, not realizing they will be out of a job soon if that Bill goes through. Lovely. Time to go garden or something.
Anyone here ask themselves what they will do when all their platforms are gone? You should start asking. Tuesday is Doomsday for Free Speech on the Internet.