Anonymous ID: 50617a Jan. 28, 2019, 7:50 a.m. No.4939036   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4939002

Read the fine print, anon.

>The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations' PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.

Anonymous ID: 50617a Jan. 28, 2019, 8:02 a.m. No.4939134   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4939089

>>4939089

 

Adding to the ominous nature of the recent approval is the fact that Dsuviaโ€™s development was partially funded by the Department of Defense.

Part of the problem critics of the new drug claim is that it is in pill form which will undoubtedly lead to abuse and black market sales.

However, thatโ€™s exactly why the DoD wants it so they can administer it on the battlefield.

 

The company behind the drug, AcelRx projects $1.1 billion in annual sales on Dsuvia alone, showing just how large their reach will be.

 

โ€œThey should stop considering any new opioid evaluation,โ€ Brown told the Guardian. โ€œFor every day and every week and every month that the FDA donโ€™t do the right thing, people drop dead on the streets. What they do has a direct impact on the mortality rate from opioids in this country.โ€