Anonymous ID: 736fdf Jan. 28, 2019, 3:34 p.m. No.4943936   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3941 >>3987 >>4012 >>4153 >>4285 >>4300 >>4461 >>4607

Everything I bolded is a GOOD thing, showing this is a legitimate investigation by the books, WHICH IT NEEDS TO BE

 

Crickets At DOJ: Probe Into FBI’s Handling Of Trump Russia Remain A Mystery

If there is anything we’ve learned over the past two years is that information leaked vociferously to select media outlets regarding the Department of Justice Special Counsel investigation into Russia and President Trump. On the other hand, it’s almost impossible to get information or leaks on the apparent DOJ investigations into alleged malfeasance by the FBI in the Trump Russia probe.

For two years, we’ve seen insurmountable evidence pile up against the DOJ and FBI. We’ve also seen extraordinary national security leaks against the president and those around him. DOJ and FBI officials, however, won’t answer any questions regarding these investigations. Instead, they resort to the “no comment,” send reporters on wild goose chases or just decline to comment.

All we know is that Attorney General Jeff Session’s appointed former Utah U.S. Attorney John Huber to investigate the allegations stemming regarding the FBI probe into Trump and alleged Russian collusion in March, 2018. However, it’s almost impossible to locate him or find anyone with any idea of what he’s actually doing.

A congressional source told SaraACarter.com that “no one in Congress has any indication Huber has talked to anyone, requested documents, or done anything else.”

“It seems like his entire appointment was just a maneuver for Sessions to get the heat off him to appoint a second special counsel to investigate the conduct of the Trump investigation,” the congressional official added.

For now, Huber appears to be a mystery.

 

The Leaks

(all leaks are being investigated by John Durham, the 2nd attorney Q alluded to; Sara lists a few examples)

 

Where Is Matt Whitaker?

First, I have to wonder where is Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker on all these investigations and I’m not the only one wondering, may congressional lawmakers I’ve spoken with have the same questions.

On Feb. 8, lawmakers should have the opportunity to ask. The House Oversight Committee announced that Whitaker has agreed to the hearing. Expect the Democrats, led by new Chairman Jerry Nadler to grill Whitaker on his views regarding Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

Whitaker should also expect a slew of questions from Republicans, who are concerned that the DOJ has failed to adequately investigate the litany of alleged crimes committed by former Obama Administration officials in the FBI’s handling of Trump Russia probe.

 

Where Is John Huber?

This is one of the most perplexing questions.

We have rarely seen any leaks regarding the investigation allegedly being conducted by Huber.

Session’s appointed Huber to look into abuse of power at the FBI in the Russia Trump investigation and whether “any matters merit the appointment of a special counsel.” The Utah attorney was also appointed to look into issues regarding the Uranium One scandal involving Hillary Clinton and other members of the Obama administration.

Huber’s allegedly leading an investigation, I say, because numerous witnesses that should have been interviewed have never been interviewed. Allegedly is also the operative word because DOJ refuses to answer even the most simplest of questions regarding Huber and his investigation. (he can get the testimony from the IG, who got it from Congress)

I contacted the new DOJ spokesperson Kerri Kupek. Here’s the list of questions emailed to her verbatim.

(See link)

Here’s the response regarding all the questions above:

 

“Huber – his work continues,” said Kupec. “Decline to comment beyond that.”

What? I sent another email this Monday saying, “Really? This response is unacceptable, considering I’m not really asking any questions that would violate or risk an ongoing investigation.”

 

DOJ Declines Comment

I’ve now created a “No Comment” tab on my website to continually post all the stories where government officials fail to comment.

It’s quite remarkable that the DOJ fails to answer the most simple questions. It’s also quite remarkable that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s majority of indictments are process crimes, or crimes committed before President Trump ever sought office, however, real evidence of crimes isn’t being investigated.

No wonder the American people are fed up and have little trust in the institutions they once revered.

Well, I’m not giving up. I’m sending those questions and much more, everyday until I get an answer beyond “no comment.”

In fact, you should too.

 

https://saraacarter.com/crickets-at-doj-probe-into-fbis-handling-of-trump-russia-remain-a-mystery/

 

With that being said, Sara is Beautiful and I love /ourgirl/

Anonymous ID: 736fdf Jan. 28, 2019, 3:54 p.m. No.4944182   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4202 >>4221 >>4285 >>4461 >>4607

>>4944013

Huawei names John Brumby, Alexander Downer board members (2011)

 

CHINA'S Huawei Technologies has appointed Liberal and Labor elders, Alexander Downer and John Brumby, to its Australian board in a bid to secure part of the $1 billion-plus National Broadband Network technology deal.

As cyber-security fears rise, Huawei, the world's second biggest telecommunications equipment maker, has doubled efforts to assuage concerns by security agencies, including ASIO, about its feared connections with the People's Liberation Army.

 

Huawei, China's most successful privately held company, has increased disclosures in its annual report and has offered to open its networks for inspection.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/chinese-telco-hires-local-guns/news-story/e5c1feac4116360fcd9875a0408e48bb

 

Downer, Brumby join Huawei Australia board (2011)

 

Huawei Australia has appointed former Victorian Premier John Brumby and Howard-era foreign minister Alexander Downer to its local board, the latest in a number of recent attempts to ramp up local business.

 

https://www.itnews.com.au/news/downer-brumby-join-huawei-australia-board-259639

 

Downer to quit Huawei board ahead of London stint (2014)

 

Former foreign minister Alexander Downer is expected to resign as both a government lobbyist and a board member of controversial Chinese technology company Huawei before taking up his post as the new High Commissioner to the United Kingdom.

 

https://www.afr.com/business/telecommunications/downer-to-quit-huawei-board-ahead-of-london-stint-20140311-ixlvu

 

China is not Russia says former foreign minister Alexander Downer (2018)

 

Mr Downer, who after leaving parliament became a lobbyist, sat on the board of the Chinese technology company Huawei, which Australia banned from building the national broadband network.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/china-is-not-russia-says-former-foreign-minister-alexander-downer-20180428-p4zc60.html

Anonymous ID: 736fdf Jan. 28, 2019, 4:03 p.m. No.4944276   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4296 >>4583

>>4944255

>>4944257

to be factual, it was $21 trillion COMBINED between DoD and HUD

 

Is Our Government Intentionally Hiding $21 Trillion In Spending?

 

In our prior column, Mark and I wrote about $21 trillion in unaccounted government transactions, primarily on defense. The DOD's (Department of Defense) as well as HUD's (Department of Housing and Urban Development) Offices of Inspector General (OIG) reference these transactions as "unsupported journal voucher adjustments." This is polite accounting language for lost, hidden or stolen money. If such "adjustments" were small, it would be one thing. But they totaled some $21 trillion between 1998 and 2015!

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kotlikoff/2018/07/21/is-our-government-intentionally-hiding-21-trillion-in-spending/#3c5a22d24a73

Anonymous ID: 736fdf Jan. 28, 2019, 4:36 p.m. No.4944579   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4944555

I bumped everyone of them today, reposted the basics for them

>>4944565

No, I'm saying the American Revolution (aside from the later mentions of Jefferson, Washington, and Madison) is as if not moar important than the French revolution