>>4944780 lb

Using this MOVIE as some sort of pseudo-explanation to cover up and cloud the obvious Biblical explanation leaves you with one glaring plot hole:

Just because it says that "Larry wanted to do the right thing," HE NEVER DID THE RIGHT THING. The guy wrongfully convicted of the murder died, his reputation and legacy forever tarnished by a false charge, and the "hero" (and actual guilty party) lives happily ever after.

BIGGEST STRETCH EVER, (and that is saying a lot on Qresearch.) Your incredibly dense association of this completely unrelated movie with ALL the evidence pointing towards this:

>>4944726 lb

>>4944718 lb

…is stupefying.

You just keep harping about a movie where a guy lets somebody else (a former minister, no less) take the fall for a killing he did, gets the girl, and rides off into the sunset. This is the weirdest case of "all's well that ends well" that I've ever seen. Meanwhile, the other explanation is tight, well-researched, highly sourced, and obviously connected to Trump's "21-day" decision.

Why in the name of all common sense are you pushing an old movie where the "hero" kills somebody, a preacher gets 'framed,' and the real guilty party gets away with it?