Dear President Trump, DHS, Q, Whennnn can we finally read the voter fraud report!

https://statetechmagazine.com/article/2018/01/states-counties-seek-voting-tech-upgrades-amid-security-concerns

States, Counties Seek Voting Tech Upgrades Amid Security Concerns

States and localities recognize vulnerabilities of outdated systems after 2016 presidential election.

Oakland County, Mich., Ups Accuracy with New Polling Tech

It's not just states that are seeking out the funding to upgrade voting equipment. Joseph Rozell, director of elections for the County of Oakland, Michigan, says that new voting equipment introduced in his county in 2017 replaced aging equipment that operated in an outdated and unsupported environment.

The replacement of voting machines there was part of a statewide initiative that used funding from the federal Help America Vote Act, which offers support to governments seeking to upgrade and secure legacy voting systems, says county clerk Lisa Brown.

The new equipment, installed in August ahead of local elections, uses digital scanning technology, rather than analog scanning technology, Rozell says.

"All of our ballots are stored in sealed containers and our system is completely a closed system," Rozell says. "There is no part of it that touches the internet."

The new system has already made a difference for cities within Oakland County. The new equipment's accuracy was showcased when a recount was required in an August city council race in Pontiac. The recount did not change the results by a single vote, Rozell says.

During previous recounts — before the new voting system was installed — the winners did not change, but the count was almost always off by a few votes, Brown says.

New York Investigates Blockchain's Polling Potential

Blockchain, which is used to ensure the security of cryptocurrency, including bitcoin, has great promise for governments because it can increase transparency and accountability for IT purchasing. But it's potential doesn't end there.

New York state Assemblyman Clyde Vanel introduced legislation this year to study how blockchain could help secure voter information and record votes.

"We figured, if it's good enough to secure your high-value assets, like bitcoin, it's good enough for elections," Vanel says, who chairs a subcommittee on the internet and new technologies.

Vanel says he was moved to consider the innovative solution after the state lost 120,000 voter records ahead of the presidential primary election in April 2016, a matter that is still under investigation by state lawmakers.

It's possible that blockchain's unchangeable ledger capability could have been the answer to safeguarding this data.

"We have to use the up-to-date technology to be able to protect this most sacred institution," he says

More Voter Fraud articles. I’m gonna flood the board with these until DHS releases the voter fraud report to us! Seriously

The Tax Watchers: Blurry line between citizenship, voting rights

By Colleen Britton

What are your thoughts? The “right of citizens of the United States to vote,” is a phrase used in five Amendments to our U.S. Constitution.

Is that right reserved for U.S. citizens? It seems pretty straightforward: the right to vote is reserved for people either born in this country, or naturalized citizens. But that line has been blurred by more recent federal and state laws, and by laws not enforced.

For example, 18 U.S. Code § 611 states that it shall be unlawful for any alien to vote in any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing a candidate for the office of president, vice president, member of the Senate, member of the House of Representatives, unless the election is held partly for some other purpose. Aliens are authorized to vote for such other purpose under a state constitution or statute or a local ordinance; and voting for such other purpose is conducted independently of voting for a candidate for such federal offices, in such a manner that an alien has the opportunity to vote for such other purpose, but not an opportunity to vote for a candidate for any one or more federal offices.

Any person who violates the above section shall be fined, imprisoned or both.

But the law goes on to say, that it does not apply to an alien if each natural parent or adoptive parent of the alien is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization); the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16; and the alien reasonably believed at the time of voting that he or she was a citizen of the United States.

Does that mean, if I believe I am a citizen, I can vote?

In California, the issue is further complicated by the implementation of Assembly Bill 60, which granted California driver’s licenses to undocumented immigrants, and Assembly Bill 1461, the California Motor Voter Law.

Since 2015, more than 1 million noncitizens have received California driver’s licenses. How many of them have been automatically registered to vote with or without their knowledge? We don’t know. There is no way to reconcile the list of noncitizen driver’s licenses with voter registrations. What we do know is that if a noncitizen is inadvertently registered and casts a ballot as a result of being registered through the Department of Motor Vehicles, there will be no legal consequences.

Except that their vote may cancel out yours.

We do know that starting April 1, the DMV will be required to automatically forward the information of all “eligible” license applications and renewals to the Secretary of State for the purpose of voter registration.

Additionally, there are citizenship eligibility issues with online voter registration which solely relies on self-certification. Applicants simply check a box. There is no protocol for communication between the Secretary of State’s office and the DMV in the event that a noncitizen license holder attempts to register online to vote. Nothing prevents the DMV from providing signatures of people they know to be ineligible to vote to the Secretary of State’s office to complete their online voter registration.

There is no transparency between the DMV, the Secretary of State’s office or any other agency. The Secretary of State’s office no longer maintains records of people who were inadvertently registered, may have voted, and wish to cancel their registration. Oversight of voter eligibility is next to impossible.

Only stronger federal election laws, enforcement of those laws and vigilance can protect citizens’ right to vote. Contact your representatives. Demand that citizens’ rights be protected. Be sure to register and vote.

More voter fraud

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/26/lawsuit-100000-noncitizens-registered-vote-pa/

Lawsuit: 100,000 noncitizens registered to vote in Pennsylvania

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times - Monday, February 26, 2018

More than 100,000 noncitizens are registered to vote in Pennsylvania alone, according to testimony submitted Monday in a lawsuit demanding the state come clean about the extent of its problems.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation, which has identified similar noncitizen voting problems in studies of Virginia and New Jersey, said Pennsylvania officials have admitted noncitizens have been registering and voting in the state “for decades.”

But state officials have stonewalled PILF requests for access to the data that could expose the problem, the group says in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Harrisburg.

CALIFORNIA A HOTBED OF VOTER FRAUD! Now do citizens understand why there shall be a WALL?

Warning to CA SOS: Clean up Your Voter Lists or Face Lawsuit

Judicial Watch Sends Legal Notice

on Behalf of Election Integrity Project California

Santa Clarita, CA. August 4, 2017

The Election Integrity Project California, Inc. has joined Judicial Watch, Inc., a non-partisan organization in Washington, D.C., in sending a National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”) Section 8 notice of violation letter to California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla. You may see Judicial Watch’s letter to the Secretary of State here.

The letter is sent on behalf of the Election Integrity Project California, Inc., as well as 21 individual registered California voters. The letter noted that 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%). The letter also noted that Los Angeles County officials “informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

Under Section 8 of the NVRA, states are required to make a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from official lists due to “the death of the registrant” or “a change in the residence of the registrant,” and requires states to ensure noncitizens are not registered to vote. The letter to California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said that there is “strong circumstantial evidence that California municipalities are not conducting reasonable voter registration list maintenance as mandated under the NVRA.”

Judicial Watch is a nationally renowned government watchdog organization that has had prior success in litigating NVRA lawsuits in Ohio and Indiana. In 2014, they entered into a settlement agreement in Ohio forcing them to remove voters who were no longer eligible to vote. In April, Judicial Watch sent notice-of-violation letters threatening to sue 11 other states having counties in which the number of registered voters exceeds the number of voting-age citizens.

Now, Judicial Watch is taking their fight to California. We at Election Integrity Project California are thrilled that through this process with Judicial Watch we can begin to honor the efforts of thousands of volunteers who believe in the electoral system established by America’s founders and who have volunteered with us to restore the integrity of elections in California.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton commented that “California’s voting rolls are an absolute mess that undermines the very idea of clean elections. It is urgent that California take reasonable steps to clean up its rolls. We will sue if state officials fail to act.”

The Secretary of State now has 90 days to ensure that they are maintaining voter rolls in accordance with section 8 of the NVRA. We at the Election Integrity Project California are proud to be part of this project to ensure that citizens of California can again be confident in the integrity of the voter rolls.

Please contact Judicial Watch with questions.

CA Office: 27943 Seco Canyon Road #521, Santa Clarita, CA 91350

Phone: (661) 313-5251 Web: www.electionintegrityproject.com Email: admin@electionintegrityproject.com

Anons ya know how you twatted out #releasethememo, I’m not on twitter but can all who are interested tweet this out and make it viral?

#Release the DHS Voter Fraud Report

The BIG Dirty Secret of California’s Voter Rolls

Unmaintained Voter Rolls + Careless Laws = Invitation to Vote Fraud

In their eagerness to involve more Californians in the electoral process, they rushed headlong into changing laws and procedures with no consideration of the "unintended consequences". They proposed (and ultimately enacted)

California's legislators and election officials have for years wrung their hands over what they saw

as a problem: California's low voter registration rate. The Secretary of State's website announces

the official registration rates as 78% of eligible citizens. Alarmed by this "low" rate, and denying

that it probably had more to do with lack of faith in the system than anything else; they alleged

that the "problem" could be solved by making registering to vote easier.

on-line registration, automatic registration of everyone

transacting with the DMV, same-day registration and even per-registration of 16 year old kids.

Election Integrity watchdogs such as Election Integrity Project sounded the alarm that unlawful

registrations and votes would unquestionably follow and urged that safeguards and "firewalls" be

included in the legislation. Legislators not only ignored our warnings, but doubled down on

their efforts by removing what safeguards had been included in the initial drafts of the bills, or

unlawfully implementing the laws (especially online registration) in defiance of the restrictions

that had been left in place.

And now, EIP analysts have found that the state has been hiding a BIG SECRET, adding painful

insult to already lethal injury: California's voter registration rate is not 78% but actually a

whopping 98%!

The 78% figure hides the Inactive registrations. Inactive voters are defined as people who have

not voted for an extended period of time and who have not responded to mailings, but are still on

the rolls. The real registration rate, 98%, likely reflects millions of ineligible

registrations.

Active Registrations* 19,314,091

Inactive Registrations* 5,056,828

Total Registrations* 24,370,919

Eligible Population** 24,939,710

Real

Registration Rate 98%

State of California Voter Registrations

Ignoring state and federal laws that require list maintenance, elections officials serve up on a

silver platter the "right to vote" of people who have moved, are duplicated, or who are deceased.

Also ripe for the picking are the un-removed registrations of felons and non-citizens unlawfully

registered to vote. Due to lack of voter ID requirements and other weaknesses in the law,

unscrupulous individuals are free to impersonate those inactive or unlawful registrants and cast

votes in their names with no fear of being caught in the act.

It is not difficult to acquire the voter rolls and select names with a sketchy voter history to

exploit. In addition, California law requires that the names, addresses, phone numbers and party

preference of all voters registered in a given precinct be posted "at or near the entrance" to the

The BIG Dirty Secret of California’s Voter Rolls Updated Version

6.22.2017

polling place. Many Registrars rightly expose only the Active registrants. But some counties,

including Los Angeles, which boasts one-third of California's voter registrations, list ALL

registrants, Active and Inactive. All one need do is look at the posted list, memorize a name and

address, repeat it to the poll worker, and receive that person's ballot, no questions asked. It is

the perfect crime!

To understand the severity of the dereliction of duty by Registrars and the SOS to keep the voter

rolls clean, note the chart below, which uses the state's own published data to show that in five

counties alone, the registration rate, when compared to eligible residents, exceeds 100% and

accounts for nearly one million unexplained excess registrants.

The laws designed to drive new registrations will soon push the entire state's number of registered voters over its eligible population unless the Secretary of State takes immediate action, as required by federal law, to clear millions of ineligible registrations from the rolls.

"It's critical that every eligible California citizen who wants to vote can easily register," said Linda Paine, EIP's President. "But the state's woefully inadequate voter list maintenance is creating misleading statistics for our law makers and putting the votes of lawful voting citizens at risk for voter fraud."

*source: California Secretary of State VoteCal voter registration database 4/6/17

**source: California Secretary of State Report of Registration 2/10/17. CA Secretary of State

Website: http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/report-registration/ror-odd-year-2017/ ____