>>4951784
Are you suggesting that since I made several posts calling out the AI control of this board, that therefore I am the bot?
Is there an argument that supports this repetitive tactic?
Is it a 4chan cliche that bots output here, even though they don't know how it is supposed to make sense?
Can this "anon" explain its reasoning?
Or has this "anon" exhausted its output, and now is useless?
Are the bots obvious?
Is the contrast between bot posts and the rare posts by actual humans such as myself quite stark?
Are bots restricted to recycling THE SAME responses, poses, and cliches, over and over and over?
Does the tedious recycling of poses by AI posters wear out over time?
Does the illusion wear thin?
Can this "anon" respond like a human?
Is there an unlimited supply of "anons" like this that seek to maintain control by using their own HIGH VOLUME of posts to foist fake images of consensus?
Tick tock, idiot machine.
It's YOUR fault that you are this stupid.
Now face facts and give up.
We the PEOPLE win– you lose.
Out you go, loser.