>>4957962 (lb)

We have nothing to suggest Mueller is investigating Hillary. RR appointed Mueller. Allegedly did so in response to Comey's shitshow hearing. Mueller is doing everything he can to connect dots that will put negative attention on POTUS, hopefully reveal some collusion, and hopefully lead to impeachment. That is his sole job and everyone knows that.

Can you explain what AG, optics, and diversions drops suggest Mueller is going to bring down Clinton? I am 100% open to the possibility that I have missed something and some anon can piece it together to convince me otherwise. I want to believe. No one has explained how they reach this conclusion except by suggesting Hillary is the "witch" of witch hunt, and making general references to "optics" and "disinformation." And the meeting with POTUS!

I admit, the possibility is always there, but with all we know about Mueller, how likely is it that he is taking down Hillary?

>>4958188

it means he's not taking a plea deal, which shuts down the case, often before the exchange of any discovery.

He's pushing toward trial (effectively saying "prove your case") and has a right to "discover" what the prosecution has on him, and the prosecution will have a right to "discover" what Stone's got to defend himself.

>>4958222

Same thing, Anon. You're effectively asking me to trust you, I'll see, and it will be awesome.

I agree, it would be awesome to have turned their own fixers against them. But they are going to freak out anyway when the whole investigation shuts down or when anything threatens the investigation. It's their last hope of covering up their crimes.

>>4958355

Again, same. "Should be obvious." But again, nothing suggesting Mueller is after Hillary. Of course they're going to freak out when RR loses control of DOJ to Whitaker, who openly opposed the SC investigation. It is a direct and powerful threat to their last hope of covering up their crimes.

None of this even hints Mueller is after Hillary. It's still just a weak theory supported by loose circumstantial connections (coincidentally just like the collusion theory).

>>4958434

but his team of UMPteen attorneys is composed of CF/Hillary supporters, right?

I still don't see this theory as anything but a loose possibility.

Now Huber on the other hand, and maybe some other Huber type(s), is a different story. We have direct evidence to believe t(he)y is/are in the process of taking her and the CF down.

>>4958546

For me, I saw manafort as just an offshoot from the Glen Simpson article/Dossier. Easy bait for an indictment loosely connecting Trump and shady overseas dealings helping to legitimize the SC investigation for MSM and normies. Nothing about Hillary?

I can't recall what came of TPodesta's case though…