Interdasting.
We see you shill. We see you trying. We see you failing.
Dividing?
Blaming whole groups of people?
Hiding DS Illuminati?
They want you DIVIDED.
DIVIDED by RACE.
DIVIDED by RELIGION.
DIVIDED by CULTURE.
DIVIDED by CLASS.
DIVIDED by POLITICAL AFFILIATION.
DIVIDED YOU ARE WEAK.
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
WE, THE PEOPLE.
WWG1WGA!
Q
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-30/gold-hits-eight-month-high-as-investors-count-down-to-the-fed
President Trump Should Reform the Fed
President Trump should use the occasion of his upcoming State of the Union Address to call for legislation reforming the Federal Reserve System and for examining alternative ways to conduct monetary policy.
A bill along those lines passed the House of Representatives in 2015, but it died in the Senate.  The president should push for a renewed effort.  The fact that the House is now controlled by the Democrats is by no means an obstacle, but rather presents an opportunity for a bipartisan undertaking.
…
Renewed interest in a gold standard is the subject of a PBS documentary, In Money We Trust?, now being aired on television stations around the country.  Authors Steve Forbes and Elizabeth Ames take us on a 57-minute tour of the monetary history of the U.S., with stops along the way on the global history of money and gold.  The documentary's thesis is that an unstable currency is not merely a hindrance to economic advance; it underlies a general breakdown in trust in a nation's institutions.  Note the question mark in the documentary's title.
Gold has historically been the preferred means for stabilizing a nation's currency, and, as the documentary points out, there has been no close competitor.  The 19th century was the era of the so-called classical gold standard, which, Forbes tells us, "was a period of one of the greatest booms in the history of human kind, because you had stable money."
In addition to the classical model, another type of gold standard might be a "gold-price mechanism," associated with the late Jude Wanniski and others.  How it would work is summarized at American Thinker here and here.
A move to reintroduce gold in its monetary role would have many implications.  Two of them bear mentioning.  For one thing, a gold standard would get the Fed out of the businesses of setting interest rates and would substitute in its place a rule-based approach to monetary policy.
Today, we have a situation where every six weeks or so, the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee meets behind closed doors and, after poring over the latest economic reports, votes on a target range for short-term interest rates.  A sub-industry of Fed-watchers has sprung up, speculating as to the Fed's intentions.  Thus, every six weeks or so, the scene on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange is the same: grown men stand with eyes fixed on overhead television screens looking for the news flash about the latest Fed decision, even as supplicants in ancient Greece stood before the temple of Apollo awaiting an utterance from the oracle.  A gold standard would do away with the Fed's obscurantist deliberations and its priestly care of interest rates.
Another implication is that other nations would emulate the U.S. and seek to define their own currencies in terms of gold.  This would entail a move toward re-establishing a global regime of fixed exchange rates, replacing the floating exchange rate system now in place.  If Countries A, B, and C all define their currencies in terms of a fixed amount to gold, then their cross-rates must be fixed against each other, because things equal to the same thing are equal to each other.
…
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/01/president_trump_should_reform_the_fed.html
I know a damn fine group of digital soldiers who can put it on normies' radar…
<nightshift
Hey there mason shills.
You got new orders or just same old same old?
Nay.