>>4960304

>Is POTUS saying that the world is now on the Gold Standard?

It's not.

The interpretation that it's about a literal Gold Standard financial system seems a little too obvious. I think it hint was "GS".

We are not going to be moving to a gold standard any time soon so even if we wanted to. We have too much cash and not enough gold (43:1 ration at current prices). We either need to find a lot more gold, get rid a lot of cash by paying back debt and unwinding some fractional reserve money creation. or both.

>>4960317

You seem remarkably convinced of this.

>>4960496

>These bills were designed that way so that when the system failed they could be torn in half..the left side discarded and the right becomes the currency going forward.

In what way does your brain work so that this can even make sense?

>>4960421

>The Gold Standard has nothing to do with how much gold we have.

Trump's comments on the problems with returning to a gold standard.

>>4960314

Q was telling us that the gold covering on the dear headdress that LDR was wearing in that pic was of spiritual (ceremonial) significance. It wasn't just a pretty hat. It was part of a cult thing (the rest is left to the darkest corner of our imaginations).

This is not about any 'eye'. You are thinking of the Eye or Providence, which is on the back of the dollar bill and which has since been adopted by– apparently – the Illuminati. Before that it was a Christian motif referring to God.

>>4960765

>we had the Gold Standard for the first 60 years of the Federal Reserve.

We had a pretend Gold Standard.