Devin Nunes Comments
Subject = (Roger Stone Indictment)
Read post from yesterday below.
Then listen to Devin Nunes interview w/ Bartiromo from :30 - 1:58 - he's very interested in "Discovery" in Roger Stone's case.
>>4955659 (pb) #6327
(2015 - to - 2019) "Future Proves Past" = 4 yrs of (Context)
Trump - Russia Espionage Trap
(COMPARE THESE)
ββββ
(POTUS Tweet)
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
If Roger Stone was indicted for lying to Congress, what about the lying done by Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lisa Page & lover, Baker and soooo many others? What about Hillary to FBI and her 33,000 deleted Emails? What about Lisa & Peterβs deleted texts & Wienerβs laptop? Much more!
5:42 AM - 26 Jan 2019
ββββ
(Q Drop)
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 5b7dc4 No.2262557
Jul 24 2018 10:45:27 (EST)
From Sea to Shining Sea.
Who does Huber report to [directly]?
Define evidence.
Who has the server?
Why does POTUS continually refer to the server? β*
POTUS does not speculate. β* (See POTUS tweet above)
Future proves past. β*
Who has it all?
Topics stated in past.
Future BIG meaning?
Repeats important. β*
Think Twitter. β* (POTUS Tweets)
Those awake see.
Those asleep blind.
ββββ
(Roger Stone Indictment For Perjury)
Stone's Bio & Recent Details:
-
Long-time pol operative back to Nixon era.
-
Associated with Trump Campaign till 2015.
β (Dec 2015) DJT states in his interview with AJ that Roger Stone suggested he do the interview.
-
(2016) Stone becomes active with Infowars. (very vocal about his connections)
-
Throughout 2016 he is (very) vocal about who & what he knows regarding Wikileaks dirt on HRC, and that he has nothing to hide.
-
(2017) He maintains his innocence and "nothing to hide" persona.
-
But he's been under investigation by Mueller.
-
When he's asked, (under oath), if he has (texts & emails) related to his communications with his sources related to Wikileaks info he says [NO] = One of the lies that got him indicted.
BOOM = He's Indicted for LYING about [Texts & Emails] - Sound Familiar?
(Refer to POTUS tweet & Q post above)
ββββ
Gen. Flynn = Indicted for LYING - Related to sensitive communications.
ββββ
Coincidences?
ββββ
How do you introduce evidence legally?
Repetition is necessary.
Has POTUS ever made a statement that hasnβt been proven to be correct (future)?
ββββ
Piece after Piece.