>>4965601 (lb)

>biblical knowledge

oh fuck you, you're not here for knowledge and you know it.

The modern bibles have all been heavily comped by the Romans, because the Essenes gave aid and comfort to the man that espoused what we now call "Christianity", while the Pharisees and Saducees put that Man to death.

And the latter two had Roman backing.

So the Romans co-opted, and then subverted the information. Just like what happens now.

The Council of Nicaea was a farce, done by the Romans to quell unrest.

The last attempt at organic consensus happened in AD 50, at the Council of Jerusalem (read: Acts of the Apostles.)

>>4965800

If my claims were provably false, you would have shoved evidence in my face already. Eat shit.

>>4965877

Getting into what if's like that doesn't interest me.

His message itself, is what interests me.

The fact that He has been traduced since His earthly departure just adds more weight to the message that the persona we know as Jesus gives us from God the Father.

>>4966034

>>4966079

>>4966179

We're not going to Mars, just to be clear.

We're going back to Mars ;)

>>4966214

Possible, in the far distant past; I'm basing my assertion on the idea that the destruction of the planet that became the asteroid belt….

well, a huge chunk of that killed Mars by disrupting its rotation, and then went on to make planet 3 about twice as big as it started out, with the additionof a new moon that is 4 billion years older than the earth itself.

Because that is the only thing that explains the age of the moon vs the age of the earth, in my humble opinion.

And Jupiter (read: Neberu) has been recorded in ancient to have gone walkabout more than once, on a cycle.

>>4966219

KEK

>>4966295

That's false just by a cursory viewing of any mars hires photos taken from space.

Ice caps

erosion evidence, planetwide.

riverbeds even

And if the planets dynamo was still active (it's not, also verified by analysis over the years) it's atmosphere would be far denser.

>>4966321

>>4966347

What is this? Is this another attempt?

>>4966427

Oh ok, so just a goober figuring out that catching cars like a dog is a not good idea…