You been baking Hannity?
FFS really?
US Evidence in Concord Management Case 'Altered, Disseminated' - Mueller
US Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office said that the evidence in Russian firm Concord Management LLC case, charged with alleged attempt to interfere in the 2016 US presidential election, was "altered and disseminated", the US court filing revealed Wednesday.
Last year, the US Justice Department said that the United States had indicted 13 Russian nationals and three entities, including Concord Management and Consulting LLC, for allegedly trying to interfere in the 2016 US presidential election. Moscow has denied all claims of alleged meddling. The firm's lawyers have made several attempts to appeal the charges, but the defendant's motions were dismissed.
The national security interests of the United States would be jeopardized if the Russian company Concord Management is allowed to share with Russia sensitive evidence in a criminal case against the firm, Special Counsel Robert Mueller said in a new court filing on Wednesday.
"Concords request to send the sensitive discovery* to the Russian Federation unreasonably risks the national security interests of the United States", Mueller said in a document filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia.
In his court filing, Mueller also alleged that evidence that Concord's defense attorneys obtained through discovered was apparently "altered and disseminated as part of a disinformation campaign aimed (apparently) at discrediting ongoing investigations into Russian interference in the US political system".
Mueller has indicted Concord Management and others as part of his investigation into allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 US election, accusations that Moscow has repeatedly denied.
Acting US Attorney General Matthew Whitaker said Monday that Robert Mueller's investigation into alleged Trump-Russia collusion in the 2016 US election is close to being completed.
https://sputniknews.com/us/201901301071974733-usa-russigate-mueller-investigation/
UN Security Council Face-Off on Venezuela
The Trump regime launched an old-fashioned coup dâetat attempt to gain another imperial trophy â what itâs done scores of times before since the 19th century.
Key for the US is controlling what itâs coveted since Hugo Chavezâs election 20 years ago â control of Venezuelaâs vast oil reserves, the worldâs largest.
They represent what the State Department said about Saudi oil in the 1940s, calling its reserves a âstupendous source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world history.â
The Trump regime wants Venezuelan reserves controlled by Big Oil, likely willing to do whatever it takes to achieve its aim, military intervention an option if other tactics in play fail.
New millennium resource wars are raging in the Middle East, as well as other oil and other commodity-rich parts of the world â a modern-day super-high stakes great game.
Henry Kissinger once said that
âcontrol(ing) oil (is how to) control nations.â
He also said
â(o)il is much too important a commodity to be left in the hands of the Arabs.â
The same goes for Venezuela and other oil-rich states, mainly Russia, a nation of vast hydrocarbon and other highly valued resources, including timber, iron ore, copper, diamonds, lead, zinc, bauxite, nickel, tin, mercury, gold, silver, manganese, chromium, platinum, titanium, tungsten, and phosphates â a strategic prize the US covets.
Its strategy for unchallenged global dominance involves controlling energy resources, other high-value commodities, food to control people, and money to control everything â controlling the world depends on it.
The Trump regime called a Security Council session on Venezuela, strong-arming enough SC members to agree on holding it â including Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Dominican Republic, Kuwait, Peru and Poland.
Against the session were China, Russia, South Africa, and Equatorial Guinea. Indonesia and Ivory Coast abstained. Operating as an imperial tool, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres failed to condemn the US coup attempt in Venezuela.
So did a UN press statement, citing a political crisis, the country âbuckling under severe shortagesâ â saying nothing about US responsibility for whatâs going on, waging political, economic, financial, and sanctions war on the country, flagrantly breaching the UN Charter and other international law, what the world body is supposed to speak out against.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/un-security-council-face-off-on-venezuela/5666695
10 Dirty Secret CIA Operations
Weâve always loved to discuss some of the shadier dealings of the government and the militaryâand no organization provides more fodder for these discussions than the American Central Intelligence Agency.
The CIA has a way of very publicly blowing their coverâseeming to pop up wherever turmoil, strife, and political unrest materialize. Despite being almost synonymous with dirty tricks, the Agency has essentially been given free rein, permitted to use whatever tactics they see fit to deal with any (real or perceived) threat to American interests.
If thereâs one thing we know about absolute power, itâs that it corrupts absolutely; and if thereâs one thing we know about the CIA, itâs that the astoundingly unethical and criminal projects highlighted in this list are probably just the tip of the iceberg.
10 Operation PBSUCCESS
9 Operation Mongoose
8 CIA-Produced Pornography
7 Pakistani Vaccine/DNA Collecting Drive
6 Muammar al-Qaddafi
5 Operation Mockingbird
4 Operation CHAOS
3 Phoenix Program
2 Operation Ajax
1 The Mujahideen
Details of each in link:
https://listverse.com/2013/05/25/10-dirty-secret-cia-operations/
Venezuelan envoy to UN says US preparing for âmilitary invasionâ of Venezuela
Venezuelaâs envoy to the United Nations says the United States is preparing for a âmilitary invasionâ of his country, amid Washingtonâs recent move to impose sanctions on the state-owned oil firm PDVSA in its harshest financial challenge yet to President Nicolas Maduro.
Jorge Valero, Venezuelaâs permanent ambassador to the UN, made the comment at a the UN-sponsored Conference on Disarmament in New York on Tuesday, questioning whether US President Donald Trumpâs administration had the moral authority to âimpose a diktatâ on Caracas.
Valeroâs remarks were in direct response to the US deputy ambassador to the UN, Cynthia Plath, who said minutes earlier that Washington was âcommitted to holding accountable those responsible for Venezuelaâs tragic decline.â
US Republican Senator Lindsey Graham on Sunday revealed in an interview with the HBO that Trump had asked about his opinion about âusing military forceâ in Venezuela against Maduro.
The South Carolina Senator added that he had urged Trump to be cautious since the military intervention in the South American country âcould be problematic.â
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/01/29/587140/Venezuela-US-military-invasion
Ex-CIA Chief John Brennan Accuses President Trump of âPosing a Danger to Our National Securityâ
Former CIA Chief John Brennan accused President Trump of posing a danger to our national security on Wednesday.
President Trump criticized the Intel Community on Wednesday in a pair of tweets after Iran announced the second consignment of yellowcake uranium to its conversion facility in Isfahan province â just one day after Dan Coats, the Director of National Intel refuted President Trump and insisted the Iranian regime was not seeking nuclear arms.
On Tuesday, Dan Coats testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and defended the Iranian regime and Obama administration talking points.
On Wednesday Iran announced the second consignment of yellowcake uranium to its conversion facility in Isfahan province.
The President accused the Intel agency of being âextremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran.â
TRUMP: The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran. They are wrong! When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different, butâŚ.
UNHINGED: Ex-CIA Chief John Brennan Accuses President Trump of âPosing a Danger to Our National Securityâ
Cristina Laila by Cristina Laila January 30, 2019 50 Comments
72Share 7Tweet Email
John Brennan
Former CIA Chief John Brennan accused President Trump of posing a danger to our national security on Wednesday.
President Trump criticized the Intel Community on Wednesday in a pair of tweets after Iran announced the second consignment of yellowcake uranium to its conversion facility in Isfahan province â just one day after Dan Coats, the Director of National Intel refuted President Trump and insisted the Iranian regime was not seeking nuclear arms.
On Tuesday, Dan Coats testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and defended the Iranian regime and Obama administration talking points.
On Wednesday Iran announced the second consignment of yellowcake uranium to its conversion facility in Isfahan province.
The President accused the Intel agency of being âextremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran.â
TRUMP: The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran. They are wrong! When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different, butâŚ.
TRUMP: âŚ.a source of potential danger and conflict. They are testing Rockets (last week) and more, and are coming very close to the edge. There economy is now crashing, which is the only thing holding them back. Be careful of Iran. Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!
Naturally, John Brennan, who worked to expand hostile Islamic regimes while he was the Director of the CIA lashed out at President Trump and even accused him of being a threat to our national security.
BRENNAN: Your refusal to accept the unanimous assessment of U.S. Intelligence on Iran, No. Korea, ISIS, Russia, & so much more shows the extent of your intellectual bankruptcy. All Americans, especially members of Congress, need to understand the danger you pose to our national security.
UNHINGED: Ex-CIA Chief John Brennan Accuses President Trump of âPosing a Danger to Our National Securityâ
Cristina Laila by Cristina Laila January 30, 2019 50 Comments
72Share 7Tweet Email
John Brennan
Former CIA Chief John Brennan accused President Trump of posing a danger to our national security on Wednesday.
President Trump criticized the Intel Community on Wednesday in a pair of tweets after Iran announced the second consignment of yellowcake uranium to its conversion facility in Isfahan province â just one day after Dan Coats, the Director of National Intel refuted President Trump and insisted the Iranian regime was not seeking nuclear arms.
On Tuesday, Dan Coats testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and defended the Iranian regime and Obama administration talking points.
On Wednesday Iran announced the second consignment of yellowcake uranium to its conversion facility in Isfahan province.
The President accused the Intel agency of being âextremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran.â
TRUMP: The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran. They are wrong! When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different, butâŚ.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01/unhinged-ex-cia-chief-john-brennan-accuses-president-trump-of-posing-a-danger-to-our-national-security/
Israeli PM plans to boot TIPH observers protecting Palestinians out of al-Khalil
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has decided to expel an international observer group tasked with safeguarding Palestinians in the flashpoint city of al-Khalil (Hebron), in the occupied West Bank, claiming the mission is working against Israel.
Netanyahu announced in a statement on Monday that the mandate of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron (al-Khalil) would not be extended, saying, âWe will not allow the continuation of an international force that acts against us.â
The Israeli premier did not give further details on the alleged misconduct of TIPH, nor did he specify a date for ejecting the international mission.
TIPH is an international civilian observer group that, according to its mandate, âassists in monitoring and reporting efforts to maintain normal life in the city of Hebron, thus creating a sense of security among the Palestinians in Hebron.â
It also reports alleged human rights abuses and violations of accords in the city between Israel and Palestinians. TIPH observers come from Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy, and Turkey.
The mission was deployed in al-Khalil following an agreement reached between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) in 1994, when an Israeli settler killed 29 Palestinian worshipers at the Ibrahimi Mosque, which is revered by Jews, Christians and Muslims.
The group did not start its work in the city until 1998, after the Israeli military refused to leave al-Khalil following the establishment of an illegal Israeli settlement at the heart of the city.
TIPHâs mandate is renewed every six months. Its latest mandate is due to end on January 31.
Netanyahuâs decision âunacceptableâ
Palestinians have denounced Netanyahuâs decision to expel the monitoring group as âunacceptable.â
The decision âmeans it has abandoned the implementation of agreements signed under international auspices, and given up its obligations under these agreements, which is rejected and is unacceptable,â Nabil Abu Rudeineh, spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said Monday.
The official further called on âthe countries sponsoring this agreement to take a clear stanceâ against Israelâs plan and âimmediately act to pressureâ the regime into respecting international law.
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/01/29/587099/Israeli-PM-Netanyahu-TIPH-observers-alKhalil-West-Bank
We KEK here Fren, your newfagery is showing
Anti-Zionism is a rejection of racism and imperialism, not just criticism of Israel
We applaud Jewish Voice for Peaceâs (JVP) recent statement, âOur Approach to Zionism,â for its âunequivocal opposition to Zionism.â We share the values and goals of justice, equality, and freedom that JVP outlined in its statement.
We wish to register, however, some of our concerns with parts of JVPâs statement, âOur Approach to Zionism.â First, the statement links its discussion of Zionism to collective Jewish pain and trauma. Second, it gives credence to the idea that Zionism is a nineteenth century ideology that emerged from Jewish life, not a colonial ideology developed to expand western imperialism in Palestine. JVP segments Zionist ideology into its cultural, religious and political strains. While they oppose the âpoliticalâ Zionism that led to the establishment of the Zionist state in Palestine, they do not spend significant effort tackling the other two strands, and as such imply tacit approval of the latter strains. Moreover, the statement goes further to redefine âanti-Zionismâ as a âloose term referring to criticism of the current policies of the Israeli state, and/or moral, ethical, or religious criticism of the idea of a Jewish nation-state.â Meanwhile, ever since the general strike of 1936 and the great Palestinian revolt against the British mandate, anti-Zionism has been defined as the rejection of Jewish-only colonies, created on Palestinian land through expropriation and forced expulsion of indigenous Palestinians for the purpose of building the economic and demographic conditions for establishing a colonial nation-state in Palestine. It was only natural that massacres, genocide, and eventually apartheid would inevitably ensue where the colonizer has sought to establish dominance over the colonized.
A quick reading of history, as Ghassan Kanafani and others have done, reveals Zionism preceded the nineteenth century and had always been a partner of colonialism and Western imperialism. After the occupation of Egypt, Napoleon marched over 30,000 troops onto Jaffa and Acre. A French report published after the military attack of 1799 stated that Bonaparte wants âto restore to the Jews their Jerusalem.â We agree that Zionism has established an apartheid state. But we would go further and state that the apartheid relationship â the colonial distinction between different kinds of humans â is at Zionismâs core. This racist movementâs colonial roots were no secret, nor were they exogenously imposed. As the biographer of Herzl wrote, he knew that he would be âgoing further than any colonialist had so far gone in Africa,â and would âtemporarily, alienated civilized opinionâ as they, in Herzlâs 1905 words, would âoccupy the land.â As he continued, âBy the time the reshaping of world opinion in our favor has been completed, we shall be firmly established in our country, no longer fearing the influx of foreigners, and receiving our visitors with aristocratic benevolence.â
https://mondoweiss.net/2019/01/rejection-imperialism-criticism/
How Israel tried to hide its âmalign campaignâ against US citizens
The explosive undercover documentary produced by Al Jazeeraâs investigative unit exposes how US lobby groups â including the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Israel on Campus Coalition â work closely with the Israeli government to spy on, smear and sabotage American citizens who speak out for Palestinian rights.
But the four-part film never aired on Al Jazeera. After Israel lobby pressure on Qatar, which funds the news network, the documentary was censored.
Starting in August 2018, The Electronic Intifada and Blumenthalâs Grayzone Project began leaking excerpts from the film.
In November, The Electronic Intifada, along with the French publication Orient XXI and Lebanonâs Al-Akhbar, released the entire leaked film online.
In the interview on Hedgesâ show On Contact, Blumenthal and I discuss the background to the film and how and why Qatar caved in to Israel lobby pressure.
I tell Hedges that the story has been starved of oxygen by mainstream media:
âImagine that, all other things being equal, this had been an undercover documentary revealing supposed Russian interference or Iranian interference or Canadian interference in US politics, and powerful groups had gone to work to suppress its broadcast, and then it leaked out, just that element â the suppression and the leak â should be front page news.â
Instead there has been silence.
Blumenthal says the film reveals âa foreign government running a malign campaign against American citizens who are particularly progressive in order to prevent them from carrying out legal political activities in the United States.â
It exposes âmilitary psychological warfare tactics being used against Americans by a foreign power,â Blumenthal adds.
Watch our interview with Hedges at the top of this page.
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/how-israel-tried-hide-its-malign-campaign-against-us-citizens
Florida blacklists Airbnb for West Bank settlement boycott
âIsrael has had to face scrutiny like no other country,â Florida governor Ron DeSantis said.
The state of Florida sanctioned the global vacation website Airbnb for its decision to boycott West Bank settlements and placed it on its list of scrutinized companies.
âIsrael has had to face scrutiny like no other country,â Florida governor Ron DeSantis said.
âAirbnb made a conscious decision to discriminate against the Jewish people and as Governor I have an obligation to oppose policies that unfairly target the worldâs only Jewish State and our greatest ally in the Middle East,â he said.
âOur action today solidifies the State of Floridaâs resolve to stand with Israel, and if Airbnb does not denounce their previous policy of discrimination, we may be compelled to explore additional action,â DeSantis said.
John Kuczwanski, a spokesperson for the state board of administrations, said there was a 90-day review period. During that time, Airbnb will have to explain to the state of Florida that its policy âdoes not discriminate against the State of Israel or Jewish people,â Kuczwanski said.
He explained that according to Florida law, any company that engaged in Boycott, Sanctions and Divestment actions can be placed on that list.
The state of Florida is prohibiting investing in publicly traded companies on that list, he said, adding the state can also not contract them for services, Kuczwanski said.
But companies on the list can still engage in commercial activities in the state of Florida, he said.
https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Florida-blacklists-Airbnb-for-West-Bank-settlement-boycott-579125
More to the point why does a US state give a flying fuck and try to force it's citizens to avoid the company?