Abbey of Our Lady of Mount Zion
The Byzantine basilica Hagia Sion was built under John II, Bishop of Jerusalem in the early 5th century. Relics attributed to Saint Stephen were transferred to the church on 26 December 415
Well, right, and we see the Jesuit connection, but that's not the whole story. Where's the rest?
Nah, never mind. I'm currently digging on the connection between the Jewish Kabbalah and the Knights Templar.
Also, the growth of Occult Satanism in Italy in the 13th century.
Well, it's something I've been digging on for a while…. imho, Kabbalah is purely a 13th Century phenomenon, and it's origin lies solely with Moses de Leon.
I don't buy for a second that Shimon bar Yochai had anything to do with it.
So then, the question is, how does that transfer to the Knights Templar?
I think it has something to do with Jerusalem, and whatever they established there.
Holy Grail is a nice myth/tale to tell people to gloss over the facts about the power. The "FAKE NEWS" of the times.
Ok…. Tay-Tay is nothing I've heard of yet… and the one eye thing, is phallic, Egyptian,imho.
But the threads of tradition are what I look for with this.
That's awful! Damnit, Dad, couldn't you have just stayed inside? wtf??? guh… My condolences, anon.
I understand the Babylonian (and the more ancient Sumerian) ties. But it's the thread of tradition that gives us a foundation to build on with facts.
"Their symbols will be their downfall".
Because, with the symbols, you can recognize characters, players, and networks. Influences, and the web of connections.
So, for instance, people talk about the Zohar as this "amazing 2nd century document"….
It's not a fucking 2nd Century document. They do that to paint it with the same legitimacy as Christians do the New Testament, which lends credibility.
That's manipulation magic.
So there, we recognize the pattern of behavior that we can draw on to make other further connections.
Notables are not endorsements
The interview talks about the origins of Italian Satanism in the middle ages.