The pole shift mechanism which was described in the C_A doc posted recently (Earth Crustal Displacement) was also included in the book 'Fingerprints of the Gods' by Graham Hancock. It was a late-breaking addendum, which he added for no particular reason (or so I thought at the time) other than to get it out there first.
Turns out the idea is not new, and was first proposed by Charles Hapgood in 1958. See here: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sitchin/esp_sitchin_3g.htm
In the theory as proposed by Hapgood, liquid rock provides the means by which the skin of the earth (think orange) is able to rotate on top of the solid core. I wonder whether the means of lubrication might not be rock but oil. This assumes that the theory of abiotic oil is correct. (Anonsplaining alert - this theory suggest that oil and gas are not fossil fuels, but are formed deep within the Earth by inorganic processes. This was the earliest explanation for oil, but was beaten down when fossils were discovered in with surface oil. The petroleum companies would prefer this to be true, as it limits the amounts of oil available for extraction. I read that the Russians are big into the abiotic theory are able to extract oil anywhere in the world with deep wells).
In an abiotic world, we can extract as much oil as we like, provided we don't exceed the reproduction rate wihin the Earth. The Cabal would not like such a scenario, as it would reduce their control over energy - better to push the peak oil and gas fossil fuel story.
Anyway, concluding my thoughts - I wonder if our extraction of oil has actually reduced the ability of the Earth's crust to move, thus reducing the likelihood of a catastrophic pole shift.