Anonymous ID: ea80c4 Jan. 30, 2019, 10:44 p.m. No.4973704   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3804

NEW- BIG-Clinton emails!

#Net4TruthUSA — 373 – Dem Pesky Emails

 

Classified documents jpeg scanned as picture so text search did not find until now

 

covered up classified identifying numbers with paper manually, so it cannot be accidental!

 

proves intent, proves treason

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yForciTYBSo

Anonymous ID: ea80c4 Jan. 30, 2019, 11:02 p.m. No.4973804   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4973704

 

Clinton's Classified Emails: When Is a Crime a Crime?

 

Let me explain how this particular crime was committed. The classified documents were printed; on each document was a header and footer that gave the classifications and other information. Those were cut off or concealed and then the document was scanned. Once scanned, it could be attached to a private email and sent out to anyone and they weren’t marked classified that way. This is also highly illegal, of course, and it is the only way it realistically could have been done under those circumstances.

 

You will notice Clinton never says whether anything was classified or not; she always states that “nothing was marked classified at the time.” That’s a convenient lawyerly answer if one knows that the headers and footers were all cut off. If you were wondering what it means to “up-classify,” just take a classified document, cut the headers and footers off so it isn’t marked classified, and then when it is “found,” you “up-classify” it by marking it classified again. An additional point worth making is that it’s child’s play to see which printer(s) were used to print the classified documents and who was doing it. Let me explain how this particular crime was committed. The classified documents were printed; on each document was a header and footer that gave the classifications and other information. Those were cut off or concealed and then the document was scanned. Once scanned, it could be attached to a private email and sent out to anyone and they weren’t marked classified that way. This is also highly illegal, of course, and it is the only way it realistically could have been done under those circumstances.

 

You will notice Clinton never says whether anything was classified or not; she always states that “nothing was marked classified at the time.” That’s a convenient lawyerly answer if one knows that the headers and footers were all cut off. If you were wondering what it means to “up-classify,” just take a classified document, cut the headers and footers off so it isn’t marked classified, and then when it is “found,” you “up-classify” it by marking it classified again. An additional point worth making is that it’s child’s play to see which printer(s) were used to print the classified documents and who was doing it.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAik5eRceoc