Anonymous ID: dcd539 Jan. 31, 2019, 11:30 a.m. No.4978351   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8362 >>8399 >>8463

>>4978287

STILL DON'T understand why courts expect a man to pay for a woman's body part.

After all, it is her decision on whether or not she wants to keep her body part or not. The man has no choice on whether or not a woman keeps or discards part of her body, so why does he need tp pay for it, if she decides to keep a part of her body.

Anonymous ID: dcd539 Jan. 31, 2019, 11:44 a.m. No.4978486   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8505

Trump crushing China means he is cutting off more of the Cabal's finances.

he is cutting off DIFi's money.

He is cutting off China's/cabal's funding of California

The cabal via China can't get their hands on the (our) latest technology anymore.

The cabal, for two years, has not been able to know what is being used against them. they aren't in THE LOOP anymore.

Anonymous ID: dcd539 Jan. 31, 2019, 11:46 a.m. No.4978497   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4978483

exactly. They opened the door for men to petition the courts not to pay for the woman's body part.

 

they have opened the door for men to claim reproductive rights too.

Anonymous ID: dcd539 Jan. 31, 2019, 11:48 a.m. No.4978524   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8581

>>4978448

I understand your point and feelings. I am on your side. Their argumments have never been logical. NOw, their arguments can be seen as what they are…illogical and absurd.

Anonymous ID: dcd539 Jan. 31, 2019, 11:50 a.m. No.4978546   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8589

>>4978485

Ironic how they think building a wall is immoral but not killing a baby.

 

Maybe somebody can meme that in an effective way.

 

Guess which action the dems find immoral?

Anonymous ID: dcd539 Jan. 31, 2019, 11:53 a.m. No.4978599   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8637

>>4978552

>Clearly it is not a separate human.

it is clearly a human being in the early stages of development

 

When do the father's rights come into play?

 

When does the father, a 16, 17, 18 etc boy get his say on whether he wants to be a parent or nor? or as Hussein said, 'be punished' with a baby, or not/

 

when?

Anonymous ID: dcd539 Jan. 31, 2019, 11:56 a.m. No.4978640   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8847

The new abortion laws are a response to the new SC justices and soon to be makeup with rbg gone.

 

If Roe v Wade is overturned, then abortion laws will revert back to states.

 

This is what the dims will do. They think they are thwarting the reversal of RvW, but I think they are just killing themselves.

Anonymous ID: dcd539 Jan. 31, 2019, 11:58 a.m. No.4978659   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8782

>>4978637

I agree with you anon. I am not arguing for abortion, but I can't help but see what I think is coming down the line.

 

There is no difference in development between a baby 5 minutes before birth or 5 minutes after birth. Some lawyer representing a father is going to pick up on this.