>Any takers?
nope
Science tells us… not religion, that an independent life starts at conception. Why would you twist a book you don't even believe?
Murder is wrong. Period.
We don't need the Bible to tell us that the baby is an individual from conception. We don't need the Bible to tell us that murder is wrong.
So stop your nonsense about us being manipulated by churches and ancient documents.
Laws change. Science does not. A new life starts at conception.
New life = DNA different from mother. It is NOT her body.
The constitution defines it's rights: "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"
Sidestepping using semantics?
Different DNA = Different life.. Any arguement? none anywhere.
Constitution? still the same.
Argue about what science is if you wish to slide. But you lost. What you quote are men's interpretation of scientific observations. That certainly changes. But the truth of reality doesn't. Your limited observations may color your opinions. But your sidestepping gains you nothing. Pure sophistry is all you have. Play with the words the truth remains/
Can someone do a meme? on different DNA and constitutional rights?
People who don't believe the Bible try to use the Bible to convince people who do to kill babies.
Don't need the Bible to be prolife, and you cant use it intelligently to be prodeath. Take it out of the argument.