>>4984427 (pp)
Not entirely, if you dig a little into other people who've gotten a Q shout-out.
I'm sure Q makes sure they're not posting anything illegal, but that doesn't mean they have the Q seal of approval for everything.
>>4984447 (pp)
Patriot or not, it'd be nice to see where he's getting that from.
THANKS BAKER
It'd be irresponsible AF for Q to grab stuff from youtube or twitter from a person who's like… a white supremacist, for example.
Or a pedophile. Or DS actor.
But after that… I'm not sure they're like "this person is now our prophet and everything they say/have said is sacrosanct".
Did Joe M have any sway before the Q shoutout, though?
His account was made Dec 2017…
https://twitter.com/StormIsUponUs/status/1067076628050669568
Or are you not talking about Joe M but mean more like… James Woods and that sorta person?
Right but was he anyone before that?
I'm not saying Joe M doesn't do good work, I'm a fan as well…
I'm just wondering about some recent comments he's making.
o7
Fucking amazing.
that's not exactly a phrase that's "unique to Q", to be honest.
https://twitter.com/EdKrassen/status/1091080473294655488
"TRUMP JUST LOST BIGLY!
The Republican led Senate just voted 68-23 to advance a measure that opposes Trump's attempt to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and Syria.
Another loss for Trump!
Another win for America!"
I think it's more of a ploy to give off the appearance of the RNC not being in Trump's pocket so that it creates distance from "partisanship" when folks get taken down.
And then removed it when the patch was noticed.
Does Pence actually have control of his twitter?
Tucker Carlson Ends Monica Klein's Career - MARCH FOR LIFE (Part 6)
They also get a paycheck.
I haven't seen one since Q started.
"but muh gov't workeeeeeers"