Anonymous ID: 0c15fa Jan. 31, 2019, 9:18 p.m. No.4985234   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5241 >>5262 >>5275 >>5293

After these many years, is it possible that the death of Princess Diana might yet come to be seen as a watershed event in world affairs? Could the tragedy be the catylyst for a groundbreaking event - a solution to century old disputes in Palestine?

Why is this a watershed event? Because it exposed the real attitudes of the Windsor family and the British establishment towards their Arab agents, supporters and cash cows. It made it clear that the power groups looked down upon and were just using the Arab "partners" as pawns - that Arabs were not fit to marry into their sacred bloodlines. This dynamic was to have a decisive and far reaching impact.

The need to incorporate these vast sums of oil money into the globalist network was soon apparent to the powers that be. Again the story of how this was accomplsihed is beyond the scope of this story - but it was accomplished and after the dust settled Saudi Arabia emerged as the leader and kingpin of the Arab oil states. Not since the fall of the Ottoman Empire in WW1 had Muslims been a major part of the gloablist power structure.

Now back to Princess Diana - although not yet proven it is likely that her death was not an accident, but a murder. Many reports have surfaced of Royal pedophilia and other severe misconduct, and certainly Diana would have knowledge of this. This would be a serious problem if Diana came to be regarded as unreliable or even hostile to the Royals. In addition it is clear that the Royals would never welcome the public spectacle and humiliation of the most well known and popular Royal figure marrying a Muslim commoner. When Diana went far enough in this direction action had to be undertaken, so it was.

Remember that Diana was admired by WE THE PEOPLE - all of us - up to and including the new POTUS. He said of Princess Diana: "I couldn't help but notice how she moved peopleโ€ฆ she lit up the room with her charm, her presence. She was a genuine Princess - a dream lady." High praise indeed.

Diana's connection to an Arab man, and her execution by those she challenged, forms the connection between Diana and the Arabs in general, and explains why this was a watershed event.

The oil rich Arab elites believed they had entered into the gloablist control structure as a partner in crime, so to speak. These Arab supported Pan-Arab causes including Jihad and terror because their general populations believe in these causes. But they did so secretly. In public these same Arab elites looked down upon ordinary people just as the Royals do. They believed they were "looking down together". They were wrong.

The execution of Diana and Dodi exposed the true attitudes of the old guard - that they loathed the "sand niggers" and considered them lowly scum. The Royals are glad to take thei Arab oil money but Arabs will never be good enough to marry into the family. Such is the attitude of elite against ALL WE THE PEOPLE - in the eyes and hearts of the true power elite WE THE PEOPLE are nothing but populations to be managed and exploited.

So when at last world events conspired and offered the Arabs a chance to topple the elite, they took it. And surprise - it was the election of POTUS Trump. Becasue POTUS had for long decades been plotting and planning the restoration of WE THE PEOPLE. And he knew it required the destruction of the NWO cabal. He had planned carefully because the FREEDOM AND PEACE of WE THE PEOPLE was at stake.

What was STEP ONE in the POTUS plan? What was the very first huge event that occurred in POTUS first year? Answer = the complete reversal of the role of SA and the Arab world. POTUS played two cards - the first was the fact that he could now prove to the world the nefarious and illegal role which SA had played. This included not just sex trafficking but the events of 9-11 as well. But SA could have fought and survived the POTUS attack on these grounds.

No - the decisive card was that the Arabs wanted to topple the power elites who had used them and decieved them and never respected them. The same ones who sacrificed any and all who did not serve their interest. The Arab heart told them what to do - to avenge the murder of a beautiful princess and one of their own Arab brothers. They saw their chance and they took it. The rest is already history. SA and the Arabs are with POTUS.

That was a keystone of the POTUS plan. POTUS went on to enlist the support of Russia and China and many others. Soon this bore wonderful fruits. The first was the elimination of the North Korea threat. Iran is next, and the best is last - peace in the middle east.

IN MEMORY OF PRINCESS DIANA - MAY GOD BLESS POTUS AND WE THE PEOPLE - AMEN

Anonymous ID: 0c15fa Jan. 31, 2019, 9:21 p.m. No.4985246   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5248 >>5269

OK then - anons - it seems like its time to put yet another major piece of the NWO cabal narratives on the chopping block - we all see it - dozens of posts and memes with an anti-Jewish anti-Semitic content.

 

These need to be treated exactly like all the other cabal lies - like all the other sliders shill and clowns - ignore. Filter etc - you know the drill. They want WE THE PEOPLE to be DIVIDED - Jew baiting is the oldest trick in the book.

 

If you don't understand or agree why this is NWO cabal deception please read this article - its a big red pill for you.

 

In the ancient world, religious differences were the primary basis for antisemitism. Judaism is monotheistic. Jews refusal to acknowledge PAGAN gods aroused resentment. Pagans also saw the Jews refusal to worship emperors as gods a sign of disloyalty.

 

The Roman destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in the year 70 CE and the subsequent exile of Jews was interpreted as a sign of divine punishment. The Gospels diminished Roman responsibility and expressed Jewish culpability in the death of Jesus. Jews were depicted as killers of the Son of God.

 

Enmity toward the Jews was expressed in the church teachings. From St. Augustine in the 4th century to Martin Luther in the 16th, Christian theologians excoriated the Jews as rebels against God and murderers of the Lord. They were described as companions of the Devil and a race of vipers.

 

This reached its peak with the Nazis, when Adolf Hitler wrote that "Rational anti-Semitism must lead to systematic legal opposition. Its final objective must unswervingly be the removal of the Jews altogether."

 

Hitler and the Nazis were experts at brainwashing the public with propaganda and fear, and Anti-Semitism was an easy tool. Stalin and the Communists used the same approach - Karl Marx wrote, "Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money." Russian pogrom and exile ensued.

 

During the same period, the Balfour Declaration made it clear that a Jewish state was in the works. The support of Britain solidified the movement to create a Jewish State, which had begun as early as 1897 and was known as "Zionism". Predictably, the term "Anti-Zionism" (opposition to a Jewish States) was soon added to the mix, as the Middle East was carved up at the close of WW1. Later NWO propaganda labeled Zionism as a conspiracy of Jewish agents secretly controlling various governments with the objetive of enslaving the entire world.

 

Anti-Zionism came to a head in 1929 when the Mufti of Jerusalem incited major pogroms in Palestine. Joseph Stalin hailed the anti-Jewish slaughters - just as the earlier Russian revolutionaries had done with the anti-Jewish pogroms under tsarist rule. The slogans of anti-Zionism were forged in the Soviet Union and later made popular in the Middle East through figures like Mahmoud Abbas, current leader of the Palestinian Authority, who was educated in Moscow.

 

The next and inevitable step was to combine Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism into an organization of political factions and ideas against the Jews. The motives underlying anti-Semitism are now and have always been clear. They make the Jews a culprit, and a target for the politics of grievance and blame. This single explanation answered a multitude of dissatisfactions. But it was always a lie and deception. Jews were neither the cause of the problem, nor could their removal provide its solution.

 

An excellent article by Linda Goudsmit (1) described the political purposes of Anti-Semitism very clearly, as an extremely effective tactic that deflects attention away from the government's own failures, and which focuses attention on the blamed target.

 

She states:

"The political purpose of anti-Semitism is to galvanize support for a movement during times of social and political upheaval. Anti-Semitism in America today is a variation on the deflection theme because it is not President Trump's administration that supports anti-Semitism. It is Obama's Leftist/Islamist axis legacy that is trying to depose President Trump. Obama's eight year radical socialist, anti-Semitic, anti-American, pro-Muslim term encouraged Leftist/Islamist and Anti-Semitism.

The current Anti-Semitism in America is being fomented to solidify the Leftist/Islamist axis and deflect public attention from the movement's anti-American platform and their intention to destroy American democracy. The concurrent restrictions on freedom of speech in the United States is being instigated by the Deep State's attempt to further destabilize and destroy President Trump's government."

 

Having established the nefarious political purposes of Anti-Semitism, two very old and very discredited anti-Semitic/Zionist conspiracy theories deserve special mention.

 

1/2

Anonymous ID: 0c15fa Jan. 31, 2019, 9:21 p.m. No.4985248   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5255 >>5257 >>5277 >>5285 >>5497 >>5773

>>4985246

2/2

The first is the so-called "Blood Libel." This is the accusation that Jews kidnapped and murdered the children of Christians in order to use their blood as part of their religious rituals during Jewish holidays. The tale is extraordinary and wholly illogical. If anything, it is a projection onto the Jews of the darkest aspects of Paganism and other primitive religious rituals.

 

No observant Jew would ever conceive of such acts. It is absolutely contrary to The Ten Commandments. In addition to the fact that it constitutes murder, the use of blood (human or otherwise) in cooking is strictly prohibited by the kosher dietary law. Even blood from slaughtered animals may not be consumed, and it must be drained out of the animal and covered with earth.

 

While animal sacrifice was part of the practice of ancient Judaism, the Old Testament itself, and all Jewish teachings since, portray human sacrifice as one of the evils that separated the pagans of Canaan from the Hebrews. Nevertheless, this story was started and repeated to serve political ends. It has no basis in fact.

 

The second is known as "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." Although the exact origin is unknown, its intent was to portray Jews as conspirators against the state. In 24 chapters, or protocols, allegedly minutes from meetings of Jewish leaders, the Protocols describes the secret plans of Jews to rule the world by manipulating the economy, controlling the media, and fostering religious conflict.

 

It is certainly plausible that the Jewish Rothschild banking family were the inspiration for this global Jewish conspiracy. For centuries the Rothschilds built a massive fortune through financial and political intrigue. It is beyond doubt that this Jewish family did indeed exert substantial influence on a broad range of historic events, from small to large.

 

However, even a casual study of the family history reveals that the primary agenda of the Rothschilds was money and power for themselves. Any consideration of Jewish religion, welfare or identity was a distant cousin to this primary consideration.

 

In any event, in 1903, portions of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were first published in a Russian newspaper. Following the Russian Revolution of 1917, anti-Bolshevik emigres brought the Protocols to the west. Soon after, editions circulated across the globe. An Arabic translation first appeared in the 1920s.

 

In 1921, the London Times presented conclusive proof that the Protocols were a fraud and a plagiarism. They had been drawn primarily from an 1864 French political satire that had nothing to do with Jews. The satire - entitled "Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" - was in fact written as a protest against the Emperor Napoleon.

Anonymous ID: 0c15fa Jan. 31, 2019, 9:38 p.m. No.4985362   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5374 >>5388 >>5847

>>4985335

yeah i hear ya fren

its very frustrating and tiring

but unfortunately we have to wait because of Plan z is used it will not insure complete waking of enough normiers to assure long term success

its a shitty movie for some of us as we know the story already but i know others who enjoy every minute even so

put it this way

it you were POTUS and you knew you had complete control woth no doubts would you not takje your time as long as things were moving peacefully in the correct direction?

i trust POTUS so i am OK

blessings to you anon

nothng can stop what is coming