How does that explain types like Tucker’s recent shill abortion guest? I just don’t believe at this point the whole perfect eternal spirit theory. I’m thinking more along the lines of principalities and powers and the NPC thing being true. Change my mind.
Ah I see you’re part of Tucker’s guest’s crowd. What was it, 5-10% cannot be saved? Carry on, just don’t think you’re changing any minds. Best of luck to you.
What am I over complicating? I don’t think these are actors, they’re literally cultists or NPCs or posessed people or communist eugenicists or whatever, but honestly I don’t believe they’re actors. This is fucking real, open your eyes.
Agree 100% anon, well stated.
Perhaps the most worrying thing would be if you’re wrong. What if there’s just nothing home, just base animal spirits so to speak, no spark of the divine, just a relentless personal wealth/status maximization function steering the ship? This is my fear.
This exact feeling, which I share, is what is so deeply troubling for me. It’s almost an existential dread, deep to the core, unescapable. How did we arrive at this point?
A new challenger appears: if you are viscerally disgusted by late-term abortion, or even just disgusted by their loudest fans, you were 100% adopted, as if that were a bad thing in the slightest. How do you people even live with yourselves?
Is this one of those fake purity test antagonistic arguments where you keep one-upping each other and getting more and more extreme, then you have one (((side))) win who then goes on to attempt forum-steering pronouncements in a direction unfavorable to most non-shillls here? Starting to look that way.
>Doing what you’re doing and thinking you’re making the world a better place
>Doing what you’re doing for money
Trying to decide which is worse
Do you think this is an effective tactic or does it galvanize others’ resolve against you and those who employ your tactics?
I think a fuckton of people with shady and potentially prosecutable pasts are going to run, simply because it could conceivably look bad to indict, charge, or take legal action against a candidate for president. However, the ironic thing is Trump not only was targeted, but survived and won exactly this, so I think it’s going to be a false comfort for them all; precedent has been set already, ironically by themselves!
[wtf, 8ch glitched, reposting reply to correct parent]
I think a fuckton of people with shady and potentially prosecutable pasts are going to run, simply because it could conceivably look bad to indict, charge, or take legal action against a candidate for president. However, the ironic thing is Trump not only was targeted, but survived and won exactly this, so I think it’s going to be a false comfort for them all; precedent has been set already, ironically by themselves!