Good morning anons,

Just drinking some covfefe and reading notables (great job btw)

In regards to past bread notables about the Qanon article - sorry don’t have the post number, but they referenced this article about Q and RBG death:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-allies-think-ruth-bader-ginsburg-is-hiding-or-dead-it-started-on-qanon

Had a laugh, but they had another link down below from 6 July 2018 below it:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-is-qanon-the-craziest-theory-of-the-trump-era-explained

Read through it and something that stood out to me was the evolution of the cover up story of the missile launch from Skunk Bay Washington. The second article alludes to it as a “flash of light”.

Now when that happened, i spent days researching, digging, making graphs (one of them ended up on a local news paper used to mock the theory.)

The point is, the cover story originated as an airplane flying in the area, which was quickly debunked. Then it went to a helicopter, which again was quickly debunked. The helicopter cover story stuck around the longest though as had to do multiple debunks on it. Looking at shutter speeds, the flight path, even going into FAA regulations on authorized colors of lights on medical helicopters. Without going into the full extent of my research on this, i’ll leave it as I literally spent an estimated 80 hours on trying to showcase the missile, while debunking the official “story”. Hadn’t put in that much work since vegas.

I hadn’t seen or heard anything about this missile launch in months until this article reminded me. And I see now that back in July of last year, their final explanation of that whole event was a “flash of light”.

How fucking lazy. Not even an accurate description of the event.

If you are curious about what I am talking about, go to Q post here:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2311775.html#2311837

Or on Qmap.pub post 1728.

Anyways, back to lurking.

>>4987683

ACTIVATE STREISAND EFFECT

Lol, these people are stupid. All these articles mocking us will only bring more attention to how she has not been seen in public and have more eyes watching (either hoping she is dead or she is alive).

What would be good is to send these articles to raging liberal fans of

ginsburg with a history of worshipping or glorifying her.

Tell them to check out the article while fake mocking us. Create the question in their mind and cause them to start questioning her status. Unwittingly getting these people to start asking about her health and proof of life.

Reprogram the NPCs

>>4987722

I like your digits but disagree with your assessment.

Another anon said (rightly and probably true) that journalists will make up whatever the hell they want about us.

Look at it this way, even if we are wrong, in order to prove we are, they must produce proof of life. If she is not dead and is much sicker than has been put out, it would be much easier for the public to accept her resignation. Even if she was completely disabled and in a coma, Democrats will not want her taken off the SC, and that will look absolutely terrible if they try to keep her on the court while trying to remove Trump.

Even if we are wrong, and she is truly doing better, shining the light on her condition brings up many more questions of how much longer she could sit on the court. This would have the effect of essentially “setting the stage” for her eventual death or resignationin the mind of normies and Democrats.

Win-win for us.

>>4987828

Delegate Kathy Tran wrote the bill

Virginia Del. Dawn Adams, a pro-abortion Democrat, apologized to her constituents Wednesday evening for cosponsoring Del. Kathy Tran’s bill that would’ve allowed abortion even after a woman goes into labor. Tran admitted her bill would allow abortion up until birth earlier this week in a now-viral video which received widespread backlash. Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam also received criticism for his comments defending leaving infants to die even after birth.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/laurettabrown/2019/01/31/democrat-cosponsor-of-abortion-up-to-birth-bill-in-virginia-apologizes-admits-she-did-not-read-the-bill-n2540571

>>4987887

This is what you look like when arguing with a division shill.

No amount of debate will convince them. Notice the completely irrational response?

>>4987989

I tried to find the actual text of the bill and failed. Would have been an interesting read and to see what the news determined “not important” to report on.

All i could find was that it was Kathy Tran that “wrote” the bill, but based upon past historical precedence (thinking obamacare) this bill was probably written by PP Lawyers and they used Kathy Tran to be the “author”.

I get the feeling that this kind of thing happens across the spectrum of organizations and types of services. Lawyers for companies write up bills, then get a “friendly” (think bought with campaign funds) member of congress or state delegate (depending on purpose and location of the companies interests) to bring it up for signing.

No sauce on that, but i bet that it could be sauced with links to these people’s public disclosures of campaign donations, and correlate with bills sponsored, authored, or cosponsored.

Maybe we should dig on this / create a thread showing this process using open source information.

Show who is bought and paid for by whom and what they are pushing. Essentially creating a public record of lobbying efforts and bill creation.