lawfag here
this is 100% true anons
the SCOTUS case that they use to support anchor babies (WONG v USA) SAYS NO SUCH THING
they bootstrapped as anon said (a RUSE)
lawfag here
this is 100% true anons
the SCOTUS case that they use to support anchor babies (WONG v USA) SAYS NO SUCH THING
they bootstrapped as anon said (a RUSE)
correct - they are using another RUSE by conflating "collusion" with a real crime of "conspiracy"
they cannot accuse POTUS of a real crime or they would be sued
well the majority of americans (nearly 80%) do not support a ban on abortion
that said i doubt even 20% support this latest NY approach
dont think this would stand SCOTUS case
yes states run elections but this is directly
contrary to the Constitution structure and would require an amendment
i filter cuz it makes no sense
we all want to hear about keystone but this post adds nothing
strange