Anonymous ID: 5f2145 Feb. 1, 2019, 8:56 a.m. No.4989077   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9100 >>9123 >>9162 >>9194 >>9228 >>9428 >>9523 >>9656 >>9730 >>9731 >>9858

 

Unfortunately, in the case of 97% of climate scientists agreeing that human beings are the main cause of warming, the researchers have engaged in egregious misconduct.

Where did most of the 97 percent come from, then? Cook had created a category called “explicit endorsement without quantification”—that is, papers in which the author, by Cook’s admission, did not say whether 1 percent or 50 percent or 100 percent of the warming was caused by man. He had also created a category called “implicit endorsement,” for papers that imply (but don’t say) that there is some man-made global warming and don’t quantify it. In other words, he created two categories that he labeled as endorsing a view that they most certainly didn’t.

 

The 97 percent claim is a deliberate misrepresentation designed to intimidate the public.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#38b168283f9f