Anonymous ID: 4087f1 Feb. 1, 2019, 1:42 p.m. No.4992448   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Was the "NPC meme" organic?

Did it appear in a sudden, furious frenzy of activity?

Is that organic?

thought experiment:

If you were to use a massive botting capability to push a fake meme on the internet, how would that look DIFFERENT from what the "NPC meme" frenzy looked like in fact?

The meme instantly appeared all over the "alt right internet"โ€“ as if fed from a common, central sourceโ€“ is that organic?

And notice multiple value that the "NPC meme" has for the system of fakeness:

  1. It dehumanizes (clearly a prominent agenda item).

  2. It muddies the waters in regard to actual AI controlโ€“ the idea of "the NPC" is conflated with the reality of internet AI controlโ€“ confusion gives cover.

  3. It sharpens division, prevents understanding, and keeps normies alienated.

The internet is controlled by FAKENESS.

The NPC meme is just one of the indicators of it.

Wake up and FIGHT people!

Anonymous ID: 4087f1 Feb. 1, 2019, 1:45 p.m. No.4992498   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4992450

But that doesn't answer the question. Does it have APPEAL to humans? If it starts to "go viral"โ€“ is that FAKE? Because of course there is plenty of fakeness on the internet, you'll admit.

I think that trope has very limited appeal to humans, especially in the current environment.

Especially with current issues (post birth abortion, dehumanization, general sinister fuckery).

This board, you might notice, isn't 4chan. It's not generic chan. It's "general chan culture board". Try to make posts on this board that humans on this board could be plausibly expected to make.

Make posts like patriots would make. Portray a character that cares about overcoming miserable, negative cultural attitudes towards humanity, not wallowing in them.

Because otherwise fakeness looks very fake.

 

Delete yourself bot.

Anonymous ID: 4087f1 Feb. 1, 2019, 1:55 p.m. No.4992615   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2653

>>4992562

It failed the test, and the only "anon response" is to jump in to ATTACK THE IDEA OF VIGILANCE in regard to AI! This a response to yet ANOTHER failed test.

Tell me how that is plausibly a realistic attitude for patriotic humans to take?

 

I test "anon" after "anon" after "anon"โ€“ time after time they fail the test. It is bot after bot after botโ€ฆ and each time one gets exposed, 1. no "anons" respond like humans (oh fuck, bots!), and 2. "anons" jump in to defend the bots, and attack any questioning of the botsโ€ฆ

 

This is how we know this board is mostly bots.

Anonymous ID: 4087f1 Feb. 1, 2019, 2:02 p.m. No.4992694   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2709

>>4992653

Actual human patriots would not pretend to not mind that the board is almost all bots though. Why aren't bots able to understand that that makes no sense?

Humans, when they realize that almost all the posts here are made by bots are NOT going to response the way that youโ€“ and all the other bots do. Do you not understand that?

Humans naturally don't want the board to be faked by AIโ€“ do you doubt that? Where is the realism?

 

Let me ask you thisโ€“ how much AI is on this board?

What are tech giants doing with their AI, "anon"?

Can you make one realistic, patriotic response? Or not?

Try, bot. Do your best.

Anonymous ID: 4087f1 Feb. 1, 2019, 2:05 p.m. No.4992727   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4992709

No, I don't.

And you don't test.

You can't attack the only human calling out the bot system, when he is fairly idiosyncratic (admiteddly), and you are all bots that are generic, repetitive, and obviously fake.

Do you understand that you can't win, bots?

 

Fuck your lies. Get out.