Not many details yet; they aren't telling the public anything about what's going on, are they? Maybe details will emerge later in the bread….
Here's a tweet from someone:
@JoshBavas
40m40 minutes ago
Breaking: Police are evacuating Brisbane International Airport and declaring emergency situation. Unconfirmed reports of a siege situation.
Yes, posted above.
Anyone watching the Yellow Vests:
Big crowd this early. Seem more riled up than usual.
They are linking arms a lot, I'm trying to figure out why. Sometimes they do this when trying to direct the crowd away from streets where the police are blocking (they keep people away from the police for safety's sake).
Anyone have an idea what's going on right now? Is it just an expression of solidarity?
https://youtu.be/haQ9ws8hNeQ
>https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/boom-massive-military-exercise-at-southern-border-a-precursor-to-national-emergency/
Looked it up; would like to have more sauce. What is this group, Citizen Free Press?
Isn't that a little beyond the judge's authority? I see that she told him "This is a criminal proceeding and not a public relations campaign." Is it against the law now to do media appearances?
For Stone, it IS a public relations campaign. Getting the public on his side can make difference. Maybe the DS is just upset that their little stunt didn't beat Stone down enough.
Hello fren, are you still with us?
"Alt-write" always cracks me up.
So lurking….
I'm watching yellow vests. Big crowd. Very interesting the way they self-police, how they defuse potentially violent situations. They must all have bad cases of laryngitis tho–hours and hours of loud singing! Kek.
If you get to the TV quick, you can watch the Groundhog Day proceedings from Punxsutawney….over and over and over???
No grenades!
Idiot people focusing on what is wrong with children instead of what is right. Human will brings into manifestation whatever it can imagine. All these fools can imagine is pathology.
notable
Thanks anon–glad to hear about this. Sasse has put Senators in the position of either having to endorse the idea that born-alive abortion survivors should be protected or risk the wrath of their constituents. Good news.
Here is the trailer to Unplanned:
https://youtu.be/gBLWpKbC3ww
I'll attach the Steven Crowder interview with Abby Johnson. Watched it all, excellent. She is one brave lady.
Abby Johnson ("Unplanned") talks with Steven Crowder about her work at Planned Parenthood, why she left, and working on the film.
https://youtu.be/6j6g_IZc04A
https://youtu.be/6j6g_IZc04A
The timing really is amazing. No such thing as coincidences. And there is also "Row v Wade" coming out this year.
Trailer: https://youtu.be/izCgBtGF-hc
A day to be remembered. Kek.
I don't think that is true, friend. First, depends on who's on your FB. But whoever they are, things like this make many people nervous; they don't want to know. Not because they dont' care but because it's something they have no control over–and may not understand. They see enough around them to know there are escalating problems, that things are coming to a head. It's fear more than anything. Better when we see people in person, easier to help them thru.
Nice breakdown, anon. Looks choreographed, doesn't it??
I hadn't read this before, even tho it's here somewhere (earlier notable). So thanks for the info.
Yes, it's infanticide. Fortunately, not passed. This issue is going to ignite the country.
The statements made by these media guys are awfully general. The 1961 experiment the Stanley Milgram's where 2/3 of people pushed hard by an authority figure did inflict what they thought were dangerous shocks. But 1/3 never did, no matter how they were pushed. Milgram denied that there was anything special about those people, but did not indicate he really looked. I looked really hard to find out what happened. But Milgram wanted to show people were conformist, had little interest in what makes people resist authority. It's encouraging to know that 1/3 of people manage to resist. With a supportive family, education, and culture, that number could go much higher.
I read the book. Abby Johnson was a well-meaning college student who joined PP (maybe as a volunteer?) because she really wanted to help women in a difficult situation. She rose thru the ranks to become a clinic manager, I think. But in the process, she began to see what was really going on–how much of their business was in abortions, not family planning services. And they were pushed to "sell" abortions, too. Then one day she was asked to assist in an abortion where there was an ultrasound hooked up (which they normally don't do). She saw too much and was is sickened here and she left. (I think that's more or less accurate). But there's something else–there was a Right to Life group nearby and they were really good people whom she got to know. That also played a role in her change of heart.
Sauce? I know it was not as represented but I don't think it was a hoax, but am open to find out.
request notable
Please do send us news of what is going on in Germany. Most of what is translated is from British MSM; and they are not your friends (as I'm sure you know).
Thanks anon. I read enough to be interested in the conclusion that the experiment was bogus. I have a lot of background here, so must be skeptical.
I used the Post article to get to another, which is very detailed:
https://medium.com/s/trustissues/the-lifespan-of-a-lie-d869212b1f62
It's too long to read right now but I scanned it enough to see that the conclusions are plausible. There is definitely evidence to show that people tend to conform to the expectations of others or the situation, but not everybody and not all the time.
I'm watching the Yellow Vests. I believe the man whose eye was shot out last week by a rubber bullet is speaking to the crowd; I'm pretty sure it's him. Here's a link to the NYT article that talks more about him and shows another picture.
>>4998375 (You) Yellow Vest protests Week XII: Tensions escalate but so does MSM coverage
I don't know whether POTUS or Q comes here but someone in authority does, because when I was fairly new I had a run-in with a baker that really shook me up. I didn't know what to do and so posted something and prayed my guts out. The person who responded was obviously not an anon. He said not to worry about comp'd bakers and shills, that they look at everything we do. The exact words I remember were "We see you." Really appreciated that comm.
Jerome Rodrigues is the one whose eye was destroyed by a rubber bullet. Here is another picture of him.
Blessings and good night. See you soon.
Anyone in the field would be skeptical of a newspaper article from the NYPost saying the expt was bogus. But the article from Medium from which it was drawn (see my other post) was unusually good for a non-journal article, so I said the conclusion that the expt was either bogus or (more likely) deeply flawed was likely justified.
This doesn't mean that all the claims made are false, however. It means they have yet to be tested–and probably never will be tested because experiments like this can't be done anymore. And shouldn't have been done when they were.
Of course, MKU has done this and much worse. To know how people behave in real life prison and interrogation conditions (e.g., Soviet Russia), there are many accounts. They are anecdotal but there are so many general similarities in the way people tend to behave that a person can learn a lot from these accounts.
From my viewpoint, in human affairs, there is nature and nurture but there is also choice. Most social scientists are pretty deterministic; they don't factor in choice. And that's a big omission.
Good morning to you, too.You give us all hope, anon.