dChan
Anonymous ID: daead0 Feb. 2, 2019, 4:40 a.m. No.5000908   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0961

Right to be a family vs. Woman's right to have/not have a baby

 

THAT IS THE QUESTION

 

Which one trumps the other?

 

3 people should have equal standing (baby/Mother/Father) with regards to their right to be a family - UNALIENABLE GOD-GIVEN RIGHT

 

THE CABAL IS DEAD SET ON DESTROYING THE FABRIC OF THE UNITED STATES - THE FAMILY

 

With no safety (“substitute procedural safeguards,”

Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)) and

no liberty (familial rights free from government

intrusion), many “post-judgment” parents and children

of today are found to be receiving the same

injustice as the slaves living in the same land as the

Founders of the Constitution. Slaves were not only

denied liberty, their enslavement certainly gave them

no reason to feel secure and so the continuum of

liberty did not apply to them. The Founders erected

boundaries to limit liberty to those of their own kind

in order to reap material wealth from others (slaves)

deserving neither liberty nor security. In the current

landscape of Family Court, the judicial system has erected boundaries to oppress “post-judgment” parents

and children in order for those in the legal

community, service providers, and adverse parties to

reap material wealth. Finding the right balance

between liberty and safety is a centuries-old pursuit

of civilized peoples but “post-judgment” parents and

children who have systemically been denied both

liberty and safety find themselves removed from the continuum of liberty and in a daily struggle to correct

this fatal flaw in our judicial system.

Anonymous ID: daead0 Feb. 2, 2019, 4:54 a.m. No.5000966   🗄️.is đź”—kun

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

— U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 3

 

What is the remedy for the Congress m/w/Senators that take this oath and then spew their socialist propaganda?

 

I understand Freedom of Speech before they take their oath of office but after the oath why can't we impeach them for not supporting the Constitution when they spread their socialist propaganda?