>>500681
>>500913
Guise, there is no infectious agent behind AIDS. HIV/AIDS is a psyop, not biological warfare. Please, the sooner we grasp that the better. I know this is difficult to grasp, but I did a lot of reading on this almost 20 years ago. HIV/AIDS is a construct. The tests are flawed. The virus was never isolated. It's practically impossible to find so-called HIV in the bodies of even people who are supposed to be dying from AIDS. So much doesn't make sense. What we really have there is a case of (probably deliberate) misinterpretation of data on different groups of individuals presenting with reduced immune system operation, which has different causes in the different key risk groups. It's all about how the data are interpreted, and all funding of alternative theses to the infectious agent thesis was stopped as soon as Robert Gallo (belongs on the gallows) and Margaret Heckler declared that they had identified the cause of AIDS in 1984. They hadn't! Gallo's work was utterly flawed and proves nothing. Please, do the research to figure this out. It's one of the biggest issues needing redpills out there....
""If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document."
Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, awarded the 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for his invention of PCR (ironically improperly used in assessments of HIV 'viral load')
PS The very name 'HIV' is a Kabbalistic word of power from the oldest extant Kabbalistic text, the Sepher Yetzirah. Coincidence?
http:// www.virusmyth.com/aids/controversy.htm