Rebuttal to Pizza/Wine Cannibal Human Yeast Theory
And general discussion on genetic engineering from an experienced genetic engineer
Anons, this notable from #6384 is profoundly
Fake And Gay
>>4999253, >>4999397, >>4999420, >>4999449 Why do the cannibals do pizza and wine? Both contain yeast
Yes, wineries/breweries are likely caught up in sacrifice/trafficking, but we know this based on their symbolism and their connection to tunnels and other associations w/known bad actors such as PP & Pelosi. It has nothing to do with speculative nonsense about bacteria somehow turning into human-yeast hybrids. FFS.
This anon was a Molecular Biologist for many years, specializing in genomics, specifically bacteria and yeast. Bacteria are simple, one-celled prokaryotes, the most primitive form of life. While yeast are one-celled organisms, they are eukaryotes, the simplest member of all other complex life. Yeast is far more complex than bacteria and fundamentally different.
>Anon believes there's an undisclosed yeast that's derived from humans.
This is technically possible but only in two very limited senses:
1) in that some simple organisms live within others either as parasites or symbiotes and can adapt to better suit those hosts, in accordance w/Darwin's theory, or
2) in the sense of transgenics, where scientists insert SOME genes from one organism into the genome of another, or splice two similar organisms.
HOWEVER: fundamentally different organisms cannot be spliced by any means, and generally do not tolerate foreign genes well if at all, certainly not very many at a time. Meaning: transgenic organisms stay fundamentally themselves or they are failed experiments biologically – i.e. not viable, do not live at the cellular level.
The foundation of Anon's theory as presented is NOT possible:
>Yeast is made with bacteria.
No. We can do the above genetic engineering in labs, & create hybrids such as ligors and nectarines in the field, but we cannot either create fundamentally new life, or get one organism to generate a fundamentally different form of life. Even Darwin himself proposed this could have happened in history gradually if given time on the order of billions of years, but the absence of proof made that extension of his theory a "problem." He only proposed Natural Selection & Descent with Modification within kinds as mechanisms of observable adaptation. The Story of Life on Earth stuff came from other people. Maybe we did evolve from primitive life, maybe we didn't, but we don't have any more proof of it than the Intelligent Design proponents have of their theory. As a scientist, I can only logically conclude I can't know for sure either way. To resonate with any story that explains a history so remote we can neither observe nor test it is in the realm of philosophy, not science. Philosophy is founded in logic surrounding the subjective, internal experience of the observable world. Science is supposed to be founded in logic surrounding the external experience of it: universally observable, testable fact.
Evolution via natural selection and adaptation within kinds has been extensively studied and proven, as well as our ability to manipulate it in vitro. I was in high-throughput production, I've literally done this by my own hand (or a robot's) on the order of millions of times. But one kind generating another kind has zero data behind it, has never been done.
Think of it like this:
Wood can make a wood house.
Brick can make a brick house.
Red clay + yellow clay can make orange bricks
But clay cannot make wood.
Back to Anon's theory
>Yeast reacts with sugars.
This is true. Go on…
>Fetal cells are used as sweeteners.
…but this is just fucking retarded. Cells are mostly fats and proteins, hardly any carbs/sugars. And what sugars might be present have zero genetic info in them, they're just fuel like propane. Come on ppl, we all had to sit thru 9th grade bio didn't we? KEK!
>Consider Bible instructions on yeast. This about fasting- fasting from cannibalism.
>fasting from cannibalism.
Also retarded. There are numerous historical docs which overlap with biblical era events and address idioms of the time. The unleavened bread narrative is well explained within that context and consistent w/mundane logistics having to do with food prep and travel. There is no vaguery indicating a mystery that needs cannibalism to solve it – the only connection Anon provides here is Muh Yeast.
Anons, we have so much more than we know regarding evidence to expose the cabal, we don't need retarded speculation discrediting that message.
Let's please keep an eye out that blatantly false, factually inaccurate nonsense doesn't get into notables. Don't have to be a dick to bakers. Bakers work hard and do a good job. Just help them out by calling their attention to things they might be missing.