>>5004473

Dear baker, I don't know if you're doing this on purpose or if you're just over enthusiastic about gathering notables.

You need to develop better discernment, by adding notables of questionable content and repeating the same old news, you've expanded them to the point you can only cover 2 breads worth in your post. This helps perpetuate the short memory cycle and the same things get posted as notable over and over and over.

two examples and the reasons

bad notable (1st it's opinion, 2nd doesn't have picture of stadium for comparison)

>>5004108 Mercedez Benz stadium resembles poppy plant?

bad title (doesn't say anything about content)

>>5003927 Potatoes and vodka, comrades.

etc…

step up your game baker, there IS NOT that much notable about each bread, learn to discern what is and is not truly notable.

>>5004925

If I could bake I would bake

once upon a time I could, and did.

These days several factors prevent it. So I keep the practice kitchen, maintain some archives and follow the notables like a hawk.

I'll help when I can, I'm just offering some advice. If I were you, I'd rely more on anon nominated posts and less on your opinion of what might be notable

>>5004995

>Moving on…

that's part of the attitude that's getting in the way of your growth

>>5005076

I understand

its hard to make those decisions

I found it best to err on the side of no

IF the item was truly notable it'll come up next bread with sauce and a little heat

By adding extraneous and dubious notables it dilutes the utility of it and as I stated before adds to the re-posting of the same items in a cyclic pattern

Don't take me wrong, just by baking you are doing a great service, I'm just adding my opinion on how you might improve and help us all a bit better

>>5005155

anon gives good advice

>>5005142