>>5005326

It is the same principle when you keep bashing the Jews. They have been used to turn your attention away from the Occultism that is being hidden so you can hate the Jews.

Now, I realize the Talmud is an evil book, but remember, 98% of all Jews do not even know what the word Talmud is or what it is for even though they live under it. They do not even know what the Torah is. Yet they do know to come to "temple" for Yom Kippur (not biblical).

My point is - you are also religiously racist. Quit knocking the Jews, but go after the ones that keep the charade going like Jesus did - The Rabbis.

>>5005371

Why not?

>>5005394

Totally irrelevant.

Each of the Four Gospels has its own special character and design. These are not to be determined by human ingenuity or on modern lines, but to be gathered from the Structure. This shows that they may be regarded as being the completion of the Old Testament, rather than the beginning of the New. In any case they have nothing whatever to do with the founding of "the Church", or with the beginning of "Christianity". They are the four distinct presentations of the Messiah, and together form one perfect whole.

The twofold subject of the Lord's fourfold ministry shows this very clearly; and excludes all modern hypotheses. This being so, only those events, miracles, and discourses of our Lord are selected which are needed for the presentation of our Lord and His ministry, and which bear upon, illustrate, and thus emphasize the special object of each Gospel. This is why certain words and works are peculiar to one Gospel, and are omitted from another; and why certain utterances of the Lord are repeated on other occasions, and with varying words.

Note, first, in which two of the four Gospels they are found, for this is also significant.

• In Matthew God says to us, "Behold thy King" (Zech 9:9).

• In Mark He says, "Behold My Servant" (Isa 40:1).

• In Luke He says, "Behold the Man" (Zech 6:12).

• In John He says, "Behold your God" (Isa 40:9).

1. Matthew – The Lord presented as Yahweh’s KING

This was prophecised in the OT:

Zec 9:9 Everyone in Jerusalem, celebrate and shout! Your king has won a victory, and he is coming to you. He is humble and rides on a donkey; he comes on the colt of a donkey.

Hence the royal genealogy is required From Abraham and David downward and this genealogy is given in Matthew. He is presented as what his genealogy shows – as King.

1. Mark – The Lord presented as Yahweh’s servant

Isa 42:1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.

Zec 3:8 Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH.

Hence NO genealogy is required. He is presented also as what he was, the lowest earthly position, the ideal servant.

1. Luke – The Lord presented as Yahweh’s man

Zec 6:12 And speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the LORD:

Hence the genealogy is required upward to Adam. He is presented as the ideal Man.

1. John – The Lord presented as Yahweh himself

Isa 40:9 O Zion, that bringest good tidings, get thee up into the high mountain; O Jerusalem, that bringest good tidings, lift up thy voice with strength; lift it up, be not afraid; say unto the cities of Judah, Behold your God!

Hence no genealogy is required. He was presented as what he is – Divine.

The four gospels are required to set forth the 4 aspects of the Life of Christ just as they show 4 aspects of his death. No one view could give a true view of such an event.

>>5005449

No, because they think the last supper was a passover meal and it was not. In fact in that meal they were not eating matzoh, but raised bread.

>>5005509

Incorrect. The books that were left out were left out because they were not divine. The gospel of Thomas for example - go read it. It totally contradicts the bible. Same with these other "left out" books.

The compilers knew what they were doing.

Matthew Mark Luke and John are 4 independent perspectives on the life of Jesus. John shows his divine side - the others as I explained earlier. Whoever manufactured this "Q" idea did not understand why 4 gospels and what they say.

>>5005540

Do you ever preface your hate of the Jews remarks by saying "this is only for the Rabbis"?

Really dude. You have bought the religious hatred of Jews brainwashing.

And by the way - the Jews are not the synagogue of Satan. Yet they are an ungodly bunch.

>>5005581

Yes, you just confirmed what I said. These books were not divine. God would not have gone off to criticize rulers and authorities of that time. And those books are not needed anyway. And again, many of them do not jive with the bible.

HAVE YOU READ THEM? I have read several.

>>5005619

Do you not understand Christians are anti-Christs too? Christians AND Jews do not follow what Jesus himself said to follow anyway. And I cannot stand the Jewish Talmud any more than you do and again Christian religions are cults too.

HOWEVER. my post was about the FACT that the Jews have been used to fixate on so we do not fixate on the truth that Occultism, Satanism, is the REAL PROBLEM.

That is my point. Get over your vanity thinking that because you have the correct mental image in your head who Jesus is that somehow that makes you special as you live a life contrary to anything he said to do by the way which is keep his commandments.

>>5005697

Dude…..WAY BEFORE we had Pharisees we had Amen-Ra. We had Moloch. We had many other gods they worshipped. Way before Pharisees.

And then one Day God came to Moses and said "I am THE GOD'.

You folks are brainwashed to hate Jews to not go after the Satanists.