Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:27 p.m. No.5006291   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6308 >>6337

>>5006285

Yeah but don't tell that to the biblefags.

They'll get more and more butthurt the more painfully obvious it is that they're still sucking the same cock they shit on others for sucking as if it makes them any better.

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:29 p.m. No.5006302   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6323

>>5006287

but where did that take place and for how long was there one-ness?

 

Was there only a single big bang?

Etc etc.

 

We're getting back to timelessness and "Objective Time" though at this… subjective… rate…

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:32 p.m. No.5006330   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5006308

You're an idiot if you truly believe that.

Or the bait, which was taken, led to something so far over your head that I don't give a shit what you have to say. ^_^

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:40 p.m. No.5006398   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6610

>>5006337

You clearly don't understand how writing and literature operated back then…

 

They were all written in such recursive ways with hidden numbers and meanings.

 

"Muh Bible Code!"

-rolls eyes-

 

>>5006363

You might as well be a liberal.

"Only a troll would question or refute our infallible belief system. Label and isolate! No one needs such concepts in their lives!"

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:44 p.m. No.5006437   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5006425

"I don't believe that was me!"

might as well eat an entire watermelon and say:

"I can't believe I ate the whooooole thiiiing!"

Don't forget the blackface or burning cross… whichever tickles the ol' pickle.

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:47 p.m. No.5006474   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6601

>>5006463

Correct.

And Timelessness is all of them at once, which makes it seem like none.

Which is where All Subject "Time/Timelines" take place.

 

Do you better understand what I mean by Timelessness=Objective Time?

Even the Subjective Times happen "in an order"

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:50 p.m. No.5006494   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6629

>>5006466

Ironically, or not, to be able to even have an experience of such a "focused" "time", we had to get as close to the 0th Dimension as possible.

Any lower than 3rd and you don't have the means necessary.

Flatland only works as a thought experiment.

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:54 p.m. No.5006544   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5006394

Then we are all "the midpoint" and there is nothing "unique".

Makes more sense for "God" to be the "Midpoint" and all "End Points"… aaaand all in betweens.

 

The Alpha-Infinity-Omega

TAIO, if you like acronyms.

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 3:56 p.m. No.5006569   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6669

>>5006557

Not as you're currently limited.

Also doesn't mean that you're not there "in the future", though since time is Subjective and Relevant… What does "Now" look like from above the 12th? etc etc

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 4:01 p.m. No.5006642   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5006601

4D is simply your internal experience of your timeline as it's habbening.

If you could see it from the 5th Dimension, you'd see it like a youtube video and your 4D experience is just a straight runthrough without pausing or changing speed or jumping around.

 

You can do that from 5D, and from 6D you could access bonus features and alternate endings.

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 4:02 p.m. No.5006657   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6721

>>5006610

If you think I'm just now coming across "bible code", you're an idiot.

Not only that, but look into the Sikh's version of what you're talking about.

Everyone has their numbers in their holy books. -_-

 

You're a sycophant no different than those who ree about "YOU DIDN'T EVEN READ MARX!" or "MUH DSM!"

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 4:04 p.m. No.5006677   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6769 >>6816

>>5006669

Yup.

Now imagine it from the perspective of The Observer who collapses Infinite Waves of Probability.

 

Those waves collapse down through the dimensions.

 

What would you call such an "Observer"?

;)

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 4:08 p.m. No.5006733   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6770

>>5006721

And numerics.

Numberology is across the board and isn't limited to your preferred fairytale.

 

Get it through your head: The Bible is just the same as every religious/indoctrination work that came before and after it.

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 4:11 p.m. No.5006770   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5006733

>>5006721

*Numerology

 

I know you won't do the digging to understand what I'm showing you, because your slave mentality makes you proud of the yolk the Church put on you, but… again… Numerics isn't special to Christianity.

Anonymous ID: 4d93c5 Feb. 2, 2019, 4:14 p.m. No.5006807   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5006735

Literally, to experience ANYTHING, God would have to "Limit Itself". Think of it like a Fractal.

Think of it like… God's imagination.

 

If you know all things, such as the future, and are all things, such as the wind and rain…

There there is no way to experience anything.

 

Unless God would allow itself to be halted, how would God know what it's like to smash into a barrier?

 

Is God All Knowing or Not?

If God is All Knowing, yet you reject that God would ever place a limit on Itself, then how would God conmprehend what it's like to know or understand Nothing?

 

Hint: That's where (You) come in!