can one of you kind graphicsfags put blackface on this baby for me?
these are from my spouseanon. feel free to improve on the concept
I agree. Not my department but that's why I love this place and the anons. If the shit sticks it sticks and if it doesn't then so be it.
which begs the question that POTUS is asking us. why didn't Gillespies people run with it? Maybe Gillespie didn't want to win…
HOLY SHIT ANONS!
Ed Gillespie did not want to win. That's why the photo did not surface before the governor election. Check out this article from 2014 when Gillespie was running for state senator.
>The opposition research is already starting. A click of the mouse and one learns that Gillespie has supported an individual mandate for health, opposed efforts to repeal ObamaCare, favored path-to-citizenship immigration reform, acted as point on the financial bailout, and (with Karl Rove) launched a project to exclude "undisciplined" GOP candidates, which is code for "Tea Party."
Heavens – the man might as well be a Democrat! Which is particularly interesting, because the source of the research is the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/01/opposition_research_in_virginia.html#ixzz5eQlSciZC
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
they design these candidates to keep the Independent voters sitting at home.
also from the article.
>So the Democratic strategy is clear: zero in on that 7% who have moved from the Republican column to the Independent, and get them to stay home. It worked in 2012 in the Montana Senate race, where a faux-Libertarian candidacy was combined with a deluge of Democrat-funded ads in conservative media against Republican Dennie Rehberg, charging him with such offenses as sometimes supporting Obama. The Libertarian got enough votes to swing the election.
They team up and run a candidate is not truly conservative so the independents sit out the election and the Democrat wins.