I'm either 35% sane or 75% sane…. in either case I'm confident about a handful of important things and confused about a handful of less important topics. It may see like a large problem but so long as that 35% sanity covers the most important issues (and I'm confident it does) then I can still be a productive member of society that helps in any number of ways.

So I'm not really worried about being "insane" so much as it just bugs me I can't tell how sane I am.

Well… just an autism thing plus a really confusing past thing….

>>5009598

no, unfortunately I'm far far outside any paradigm that would be measurable through association. Which all facts and figures in society are built upon. I was a mk ultra victim and just briefly decided to think out-loud about just how confident I am about things. And the answer was both comforting and frustrating.

Any test I take I'll prove myself sane because I always do. I can think like a sane person yet when I consider myself and think as myself I realize there is a large disconnect between when I'm thinking like other people versus myself - and knowing this distinction is why I can be confident I'm at least 35% sane - and possibly up to 75% I just can't figure out which because… well, it's complicated..

meh, don't worry about it. certain people follow my posts so I felt like saying some things for their benefit that include my current thinking on things. It's important to update them and tho I have another method to do that I just felt like putting it here where anon's (and clowns) could also see it.

Perhaps a mistake… or not, we shall see

>>5009650