Anonymous ID: 6cccfb Feb. 2, 2019, 8:16 p.m. No.5009555   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9626

>>5009329

 

Too tired for an elegant rebuttal or moral appeal

consider

PP started by Margaret Sanger

her multitude of writings indicate that a major goal of abortion is eugenics based. and just her either. it was a substantial movement championed by marxists, progressives, intellectuals etc.

the nazis brought over american eugenicists in the 30's to lecture on its uses.

long and short

PP was started, in part, to carry out a policy of eugenics (soft genocide) against targeted groups.

this was not started as some misguided expansion of liberty and choice. it was started to mold society by eliminating classes of people.

civil rights, personal choice aside, that alone should make you extremely suspicious if not outright against the abortion issue

why continue unquestioningly carrying out SOME ONES plan for genocide?

Anonymous ID: 6cccfb Feb. 2, 2019, 8:37 p.m. No.5009784   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9803

>>5009626

not looking for solution(in this post context)

this was a response to you claiming Q resorting to a moral bias for being against PP

 

I was pointing out that there are rational and strategic reasons to be against it

western style cultures are literally dying out of existence

falling populations are literally a national security issue

as would attempted manipulation of cultural composition.

just something to think about