>I wouldn't be surprised if everyone listed here ends up in jail.
Here's my 2 cents worth. >>501047
>Let me know if you need help and I can help build a few topic threads we can link to.
I'm trying to get coders (not my area) on task to make as much of the history searchable. Started off to a good response but it's gone kind of flat. If anon's are working behind the scenes, please share progress periodically on Quest Fore Searchability:
https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/494745.html
>asking questions…
Link: https:// www.intellihub.com/teacher-grazed-by-parkland-shooters-bullet-shooter-was-in-full-metal-garb-helmet-face-mask-bulletproof-armor-shooting-a-rifle-i-never-seen-before/
That teacher is on thin ice messing with the narrative.
>OK I dug up all the discussions here
About 80% of the concerns voiced here could be addressed with a searchable format of post keywords. We can already search Q, we need to be able to search all posts/all digging.
There has been a shit ton of good research that's tangential to Q's mission that's moldering away in archived threads. For example, there was a post (yeah, that I failed to copy) that I saw about reopening an investigation into the 12 Israeli art students and them getting micro thermite. I can't spend 60 hours going thru the last months posts to find it. Outside search engines are silent on it. We just need to come up with a way to search /pol/cbts/CBTS/TheStorm/Qresearch/.
>The majority was the links to articles, not much in the bread itself.
That's what I was looking for, thanks. At the pain of repeating myself though, asking anon's wastes time and resources and shits up the board. There's gotta be a better way.
I hate to admit it, but this anon is right: >>501395
>Honestly, blunt and direct time, if we can't categorize our findings for later, we are wasting our time!
https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/494745.html
>should be using a crew served weapon to help build teamwork skills
I like they way you think, Marine.