>>5020232

1. Do you recall the subsequent date(s) after 11-11-2018 when the 17-second pulse train thing reoccurred?

2. Do you believe the screenshot of a LHC/CERN status console dated Dec. 4, 2018 that indicates a shutdown JUST HAPPENED and the fire brigade was being called due to a "massive power glitch" on Dec. 4, 2018 at 11:11:58 (in some European time zone)? I'll repost it for reference.

We need solid date/time correlations if we're going to make anything of this data.

This document that I just found seems to indicate that before 2018 commenced, a shutdown was PLANNED for early December 2018. The screenshot isn't very good so click the PDF for a readable version.

https://beams.web.cern.ch/sites/beams.web.cern.ch/files/schedules/LHC_Schedule_2018.pdf

I am starting to think that the report of a massive power glitch on 12/4/2018 may be fake. Unless the "massive power glitch" occurred, unrelated to the planned shutdown.

>>5020578

23 days later after the 11-11-2018 spike, the LHC was shut down on schedule (the schedule was determined late in 2016).

See >>5020333

I have decided to stop investigating this unless more compelling info turns up.

>>5020663

Is a stupid, juvenile ad hominem the best you can come up with, shill?

Oh by the way your redtext appears as faggoty pink text.

You probably need a magnifying glass every time you relieve yourself so you can find your package.

>>5019453 (lb) That must have been the most shallow conversation ever held. Between an older, more clever, yet fallen & deceitful mind, and the prancing retard.