Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 10:09 p.m. No.5022675   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5022650

You have a right to your opinion, as do I. Q's information drops led me to research and understand an enormous amount about how the world actually works, answering most of the pressing questions I've had for most of my life.

 

You, on the other hand, are cold shit in a dixie cup.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 10:20 p.m. No.5022751   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5022704

>But yes that 17 second blip everyone heard would be what a sub being blown up under water might look like.

I'm going to go with 'nope'. If it were shockwaves from a nuke, it would have a resonant frequency a lot lower than 1/17Hz. Traveling through sea water, it would be around 166 seconds, and that would be assuming the EARF is 100% sea water, which it isn't.

 

Unless there's something significant I'm missing, it wasn't anything resonating (as in the result of an explosion.)

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 10:29 p.m. No.5022816   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5022775

I don't believe it is 'beyond that'. My reasoning is because in this whole Q thing, one of the big new things is the drop of information about how the occult organizations actually work. From a zoomed out game theory view, this hurts deceptive actors because it reduces the play space they can move in.

 

The bad guys would never make a move that reduces their abilities. The only way they'd do that is if they had something significantly more powerful and it was done, developed and tested in real life. This would take the form of the boot on your face forever - not what we're seeing.

 

If there is some left-over corruption in all of this, it will be left with a much more difficult time. Technology's advance will keep doing this over and over again into the future until the species either finds its moral equilibrium or we wipe ourselves out.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 10:52 p.m. No.5022967   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5022957

>Everything on this board is an assumption

False. There is a lot of evidence, like screen shots of actual things appearing online. The existence of those things isn't an assumption. Believing the truth they purport is an assumption.

 

But yes, tons of what Q has said is plausibly deniable, just like I believe Q wants it.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 11 p.m. No.5023021   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3089

>>5023005

>If it's in all of us, they could probably send a frequency through the phone that activates it and completely FUBARs our asses.

Without 100% confidence, I don't think this is how it would work. Monarch programming works off of A/V triggers. So they'd most likely say stuff via voice (on the phone) to access various alters and modify behavior.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 11:14 p.m. No.5023107   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3115

>>5023089

>Our brain waves operate on frequencies. When Q dropped that last MK drop, I searched nano particles and what they've been doing. They said it can re-generate its own system, setting up a completely new one in your body. I believe they were using it on soldiers with PTSD and stuff. Flicker rates can also trigger MK-U per the visual side, hiding subliminal messages in ads and shows. 40,000ft for sure.

Ok, well, believe what you want. I'll put it a different way: I think everything you just typed is bullshit. I suggest reading a lot about actual Monarch slave programming. Then study a lot of physics and electronics. I think you'll come to the same conclusion.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 11:20 p.m. No.5023141   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5023131

>Still waiting to see what they do with that Graphene stuff they came up with several years ago.

The most likely thing is very little for a long time. Most media is FULL of hype and bullshit. I've watched it my entire life. In my estimation, 95% of what's said is just around the corner is total bullshit. Beware the media when it relates to technology.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 11:22 p.m. No.5023151   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3158

>>5023135

>could be triggered to react and release said drugs on a certain frequency or command.

The reason is there are other, less expensive/complicated ways to do it. For example, nanoparticles of aluminum (or any metal) in your body + intense HF radiation (think 5G on steroids) could do it.

 

You don't need nanobots that respond to cell phones. That's mainly what I'm suggesting is absurd. They're not filling the population with nanobots.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 11:32 p.m. No.5023207   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3217

>>5023191

>Anyone think we might actually see more indictments this week?

Well, sealed court actions are running around 160-170 per day for the last 14 months. Of those (if historical norms persist), around 30% should be indictments.

 

Soโ€ฆYES.

 

Unsealed/public indictments? Yesโ€ฆover the last year there has been a constant stream of indictments and they've been slowly ratcheting up the food chain.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 11:34 p.m. No.5023215   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3232 >>3233

>>5023197

>Who knows what kind of quantum tech they got by now.

Physics has limits. Don't believe the hype. Most claims about what will happen in the future are empty.

 

I'd say MIL is about 20 years ahead, but that's a guess. I've been able to figure out things that are still classified. It just takes knowledge and effort.

Anonymous ID: b1c1ec Feb. 3, 2019, 11:36 p.m. No.5023228   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5023217

Yes. It is a constant stream. My guess is many are staying sealed because their publication would endanger other pending investigations. (Another way to put this is we're seeing the largest legal constipation in history.)