ABORTION WAS ALWAYS WRONG AND PRO-CHOICE WAS ALWAYS WRONG

The people making these arguments never made them in good faith. Those on the "pro-choice" side of the abortion debate who brought up the viability of a fetus outside the mother, who pointed to a blurred line beyond which that fetus became a person, only did so in order to obfuscate and confuse. These people would have you believe that they are just as compassionate, as caring, as GOOD people, people who are just as concerned about the lives of children as you are and who are just as apalled at the idea of infanticide. They would have you believe that their position on this issue is born out of genuine confusion and disagreement about viability and the point at which a fetus becomes human, but that they don't actually think of themselves as being for infanticide. They would have you believe that they don't consider abortion to be infanticide, and that they would care if that's what it was. Recent news has proven that this is far from the truth. They're fine with early abortion, they're fine with late-term and partial-birth abortion, and they're fine with post-birth abortion. That is, they're fine with infanticide. Straight-up, flat-out murder. Those who mocked Trump for his claims that Clinton's, and by extension Democrats', policies would lead to abortion at 9 months must now admit that the present has proven the past. The orange boogeyman was right. The slippery slope was never a fallacy, and those pushing the agenda of "pro-choice" always intended for the Overton window to get here eventually. And here we are. In light of this, it's time that we reconsider. When we as a country first accepted the arguments of "choice," we accepted them from politicians who made them in bad faith. Those who sold us on early abortion always wanted to get here, to post-birth abortion, and the ones who sold us on a clump of cells and a heartbeat never cared whether that clump of cells was human or not. The Overton window having moved, they're fine with infanticide, and they always were fine with it privately, whatever their public positions were. I'm sure we can all agree that infanticide is wrong. But realize that when we decided on where this line was, we decided on the basis of arguments made by insincere liars and murderers to begin with. THEY WERE WRONG EVEN BACK THEN.

THEY WERE ALWAYS FINE WITH KILLING BABIES

>>5023615

>My guess he takes the body blows of the abortion stance in exchange for exoneration on racism picture.

Might be a bad move. Any dems digging their heels in on being the Party of Abortion are gonna be in for a bad shocked.

Toxic for everyone associated. Impossible to defend.

>>5023599

When it was 3-3 in the 3rd, Patriots vs Rams, the sheer level of symbolism was overwhelming.

>truth would put 99% in hospital

I don't want to slide the bread with kooky /x/-tier nonsense, and I know most people don't take this shit seriously, but I'm just going to throw this one out there:

This whole abortion/human trafficking/pizzagate/Planned Parenthood/moloch/ ritual sacrifice thing? It ties in with these bastards. STRONGLY.

I am not shilling. I am dead-serious. When this shit hit me, I got shivers up my spine.

At some point up the human harvesting ladder, these people know they're working for them. The whole series of operations suddenly makes sense now.

I am not fucking kidding, guys.

>>5023702

I don't even know where to begin. I've been doing the UFO/ayy thing for like 19 years now and it's a deep hole.

What just hit me, though, is that the organ/biological resource/gene harvesting that the DS does is pretty much MO for the greys. It makes sense.

Fetal experiments. Gene manipulation. Transplantation surgery. Organ harvesting. Cloning. Splicing.

I'm having a rough time getting it all organized, but I think Planned Parenthood, the people pushing for all of this stem cell shit, the people harvesting and kidnapping human beings-I think they ultimately answer to them. And I think this is them. The cattle mutilations. the abductions. The hybrid children. The embryos. The human body parts. This is why.

>current biotech does not originate from here

>>5023731

>eugenics/nazis/NWO/paperclip/secret aircraft

>Alastair Crowley/occultism

>organ harvesting/Planned Parenthood/human trafficking

>cloning/gene splicing/stem cell research

>Vatican

>weird lights in the skies

>global population reduction/control

>bloodlines

It all converges on the greys, Anon. It's tough admitting it, but it does.

>>5023747

On a related note, that lady who claimed to have a photo of RBG?

WHY IS SHE AT A FACILITY IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION IN NEVADA?

That just screams "DUMB" to me, and DUMBs in the desert mean ayys. If that photo was legit, RBG may be getting some VERY advanced medicine. Perhaps transplantation.

>>5023762

To be perfectly honest, I don't think they're an advanced race from outer space. It's almost impossible to explain what I think they are.

The grey bodies are just the vehicles. They aren't what they claim to be.

>>5023771

I honestly don't think so.

The bodies, the grey ones, again, are just their vehicles. Like our bodies are for us, but lots of people deny it.

For years there were accounts of alien encounters where the aliens showed a little black box to humans. The aliens held up the box and pointed to it, then returned to their spacecraft and left. People having such encounters wondered why the aliens did not try to communicate with them further. The contents in the little black box remained a mystery for decades. Thanks to investigators such as Budd Hopkins and Dave Jacobs, we now know what is in the box.

The box contains a live fetus of a hybrid which is part human and part alien. Showing the box is an act of triumph. The aliens plan to colonize the earth with their new race and replace the human race. By showing the box the aliens are demonstrating that they have succeeded in creating a replacement for the human race.

I think it's entirely possible they want to replace us with hybrids so that they-the real "they," not the grey bodies-can incarnate in this world instead of human souls. Think demons.

I know this probably seems MAXIMUM /x/-tier, but I'm serious.

>>5023812

I don't know. I've thought maybe the act itself allowed them in, maybe the adrenochrome does it, etc. I'm not sure.

In any case, possession is on the right track. Literal and biblical possession. And that ties into dissociative personality disorder. And that ties into MONARCH programming. Which ties bak into the illuminati and the intelligence agencies. Which ties straight back into AYY territory.

>>5023823

I unironically think meat/industrial slaughterhouses tie into it, too. Probably gonna get a lot of hate for this, but…go veggie.

In any case, I had never considered the idea that the subconscious itself was a parasite. It would lend a darker edge to all those times your subconscious takes control of your mouth and makes you say something you didn't expect.

>>5023854

This is practically the Q theme song.

I think johnny knew.

>>5023702

…holy fuck, that apocalypse vision from half with the skin-takers suddenly makes sense. I need a smoke.

>>5023872

This actually kinda makes sense.

Say you commit a sin as an eternal being. How can you be saved? There's no room for change or motion.

What if God placed us in time to allow us the chance to be saved? Something that would allow for a redemption arc?

>>5023876

Will do. Thanks a bunch.

Any further pointers so I can stay up even later tonight?

>>5023823

Sauce on pic?