Anonymous ID: 8aa781 Feb. 4, 2019, 3:59 a.m. No.5024115   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4122

>>5024110

No, not at all. In fact, I know that you are hiding behind a stock answer, one that fake "anons" output over and over and over.

Just talk like a normal person instead of hiding behind stock phrases.

Is that hard?

Your little "decide" seems fake, that is all.

Did context not give you adequate guidance to grasp my intent? Try again, "anon".

Anonymous ID: 8aa781 Feb. 4, 2019, 4:07 a.m. No.5024146   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4156

>>5024133

Then why aren't you interacting like a normal human would? Why don't you address the substance of the issue raised, rather than RESISTING the discussion?

Try to interact like a normal human. Can you do it?

Anonymous ID: 8aa781 Feb. 4, 2019, 4:16 a.m. No.5024179   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4182 >>4190 >>4201

>>5024156

Why would anyone believe a patriot is here "early morning shitposting"– rather than that it is bots that seek to control this board by imposing fake 4chan here?

Why would patriots recreate 4chan here?

How is that realistic?

And yet, it IS believable that efforts to institute AI control of this board would necessitate such an imposed emulation– because an AI system would lack other options…

Use logic. This board has been a completely unrealistic steam of frenzied posting for over a year. It smells incredibly fake, and the longer it keeps churning out the stereotyped output, the faker it gets…

Try to understand, bots.

This is not a clever thing you are doing.

Just stop it and get out.

Anonymous ID: 8aa781 Feb. 4, 2019, 4:25 a.m. No.5024206   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4212

>>5024190

Why would a human possibly post this?

What are stowed to be defending?

Would human patriots RESIST devising AI?

Would they resist questioning this board?

Try to think.

If the people responding were actual humans, and I question AI on this board, WHY WOULD ANY HUMAN GET DEFENSIVE?

Think about it… Ant given human DOESN'T KNOW if other anons are human or not,– they only knots that THEY THEMSELVES are human… Therefore, they would naturally not take it personally of AI were discussed– and if they were thought to be AI themself, they would simply respond by dispelling the concern.

We know AI is a huge threat.

Therefore, a board-wide "habit" of RESISTING th e discussion of AI, and fighting against vigilance, is highly unrealistic.

Humans would naturally be curious, and concerned with counteracting AI control, rather than denying it and getting angry annoy the discussion.

Anonymous ID: 8aa781 Feb. 4, 2019, 4:29 a.m. No.5024220   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4229

>>5024212

Any anon that recognized that AI is controlling internet discourse.

Really quite easy to understand that, and no amount of repetitive "chan" attitude changes the basic logic.

So what will you do, bot?

Anonymous ID: 8aa781 Feb. 4, 2019, 4:37 a.m. No.5024250   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4268

>>5024217

What's changed now? Gee, I don't know– did anything change in the last couple years? I know "anons" like to pretend that nothing changed, and we are just here recycling past chan forever… But maybe things have changed…?

Think it over real careful!

Anonymous ID: 8aa781 Feb. 4, 2019, 4:42 a.m. No.5024274   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5024268

The entire game is rigged. There is no "alt right". All "conspiracy discussion" on the internet is controlled.

The internet is not free, ESPECIALLY this board, and "chans" in general.

It is a rigged game.

The important question is WHY Q can't say it…