>>5025622 lb
>That's the result of Day Shift not picking up their slack.
your words not mine
dayshift put together the DTCC digs on sat/sun
in case you didn't notice that.
anon also works nightshift too.
>>5025622 lb
>That's the result of Day Shift not picking up their slack.
your words not mine
dayshift put together the DTCC digs on sat/sun
in case you didn't notice that.
anon also works nightshift too.
Apple Should Buy Netflix or These 2 Other Companies, JPMorgan Says
The market is buzzing on which companies Apple (ticker: AAPL) should buy with its massive cash war chest.
JPMorgan ’s Apple analyst Samik Chatterjee believes Apple should look in the video streaming content, videogaming, and smart home speaker markets for its next big deal. He has targeted Netflix , Activision Blizzard , and Sonos as good fits for the tech giant.
CEO Tim Cook reminded investors in a letter last month that Apple’s goal is to be “net-cash neutral” over time, meaning that Apple needs a use for its $130 billion in net cash. He also made it clear the company continues to ponder large acquisitions as well in a recent interview.
______
This rumor about several company's buying NFLX has existed since the start of it. First it was Blockbuster, then apple then amazon and the beat goes on.
Of couse the #10 and 12 largest holders of Apple stock would gain much from this transaction. Jawboning the shares higher.
NFLX burns $15m is cash each day
https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-should-buy-netflix-activision-blizzard-sonos-jpmorgan-says-51549291553
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/apple-stock-attractive-entry-point-morgan-stanley-2019-1-1027897364
Here are the NFLX institutional holders as they would get the biggest benefit in a potential transaction that has these 'analysts' speaking to a 20% premium over current share price.
The first four letters of analyst are…
kek
Apple Inc. (AAPL)
170.92+4.41 (+2.64%)
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)
349.26+9.41 (+2.77%)
https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/nflx/institutional-holdings
no tips in there. No advice. Market mechanics are discussed here and nothing else.
Equity prices are given in support of these analysts pumping these stocks higher on nothing moar than rumors and insinuations.
Too bad you see it as 'advice'.
Places to go for that and this is not one of them.
How new are you ?
It's news and reaction. You must have missed the TESLA news buying a battery company.
They have a little problem of a departing CFO soon and major issues with it's technology
i do use ZHfor nothing moar than it's charts and graphs.
I did similar after 2011. These issues with MF Global finally made me say enough.
Shorting has the most money to make for the system as they pile people into them on the short side with the analysts who rec'd to do that in many cases well after the moves have been made.
If there is a huge short interest in any stock the system wanks on the short leash by moving the stock higher regardless of th eresults. See the banks stocks a few weeks ago. Those results when drilled into were horrible yet in most cases they did not drop consistent with the results reported. The day they were released the individual one's dropped on respective earnings release's but the entire sector did not.
I also do not like the entire pay for market news as it's nothing moar than paytriots.
Most of what they sell is available to anyone if you take the time to research it. Amazes me how people trust other's with investments simply because that person took a test and became a financial planner. There are good ones but as in the realtor market most are not and only see the paycheck
This is an old game.
rack 'em and stack 'em
am a little touchy on the advice moniker placed on doing this when we had the krassentwats come in here and…well you know.
warned back in september that I had no skin in the game. Went a bit overboard in posting charts about markets but imo it got moar people to pay attention to what goes on and how it's done.
was in lurk mode then and saw that. Just got worse but as long as we work they can all fuck themselves.
absolutely. They have waivers due to the stock act passed by hussein. It says they can't do it but they do. It is a poorly written and completely ambiguous piece of crap. The conviction rate of any of it is basically zero as it has to be 100% provable. Not easy with the plethora of lawyers that work to protect them.
trust me I know about that. Krassentwats all over me from start of the year and even prior.
It's hilarious to me but have to beat it back for very same reason you mention.