>>502734

clowns are rarely if ever only clowns, by definition.

would be surprising if they didn't at least try to have assets in MI, so being in one can never be be proof (positive/negative) of the other

>>502779

"maybe"

pfff

>>502806

i approve of this message.

Got annoyed at Wictor/Rex/FakeJeff at first when they discovered/bashed Q, very quickly got over it - moreso, i understood it was obviously part of the plan. Not organic, too organized, too purposeful.

Haven't given a fuck about em since and feeling GREAT

>>502825

shhhh

if he learns to stop namefagging/capslocking he won't be so easy to skip over/filter, and then we might end up actually reading him

Those who cannot understand that captchas are not private magic messages from Q, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.

>>502870

<goes to first restaurant, eats

<handler isn't there

>ok then, goes to second restaurant

>at least wasn't programmed to slit his own throat

>>502913

please stop

>>502976

if you could not bake/technicolorbake again, ever

that would be

GREAT

>>503025

thanks for taking the time, but the fact that you even have to explain this to technicolorbaker is proof enough that he should never have baked at all/shoudl never be let bake again

>>503070

ugh

so sick of that guy

…why are are so many of you so obsessed with finding two people are the same person by randomly juxtaposing pics?

…why are are so many of you so expecting bad actors to all be part of the same big family?

O STAR WARS SAGA WHAT HAVE YOU DONE

>>503229

but if anons can't put 2 pics next to each other for every single person of interest ever how are they going to do any RESSURCHE?

>>503247

the louder you scream

the more filtered you are

>>503255

but that's like expecting people who don't follow the rules to have actually taken time to read them…

like expecting people read bread/top posts instead of barging in with "hey guys what happened".

or expecting people not to discuss at length their own unique and mindblowing original unique insight of AlexJones every chance they get.

or the keystone.

or P.

or 4,10,20.

if you have constructive ideas

do them, get started

don't expect anyone to do anything for you (one of the worst/most obvious ways newfags be newfaggin: guys WE really should (x)… guys SOMEONE has to (x)… nope.)

>>503279

>at least i stood up

maybe if you didn't a dozen competent bakers (who didn't want to make duplicates/split the threads) would have done a good job instead of playing at "let's see how many effects and dumb shit i can cram into bread before anonshave me banned"

i am so sick of bakerworship

big thanks to smart bakers who cleaned this shit up through the weekend

whips and perpetual prison for those who barfed it up

>>503360

words mean many things to many people.

particularly when masses of people are involved/trends.

see

-hipster

-geek

-autist

(yes psychiatric constructs are used for evil)

(no the very specially talented people would not magically disappear/stop being special if cabal arrested = please understand where the fuck y'are and why, and proceed to LURK very MOAR)

>>503449

you seem to have missed the point: you will never, ever proove the existence of crisis actors, let alone identifying one by comparing pictures.

however right you are, your "method" of "investigation" is so flawed it is beyond ridiculous, and discredits serious attempts at investigation of these serious matters.

garbage "conspiracytheory"research 101 = controlled opposition/useful very idiots

>>503460

ok now for a little bit of scientific method: see how many people you can find who you know are NOT pedophiles have the same feature

" definately the same guy. "

(1000th sigh)

Guys. Eric Clanton was not found by putting 2 pics next to each other. It was (a little) more complicated than that.

>>503521

definately the same car

you can tell

because pictures

>>503549

careful those post numbers aren't Q's they're from the fan/archive websites (and those don't always agree with each other).

convenient to direct towards a drop when consistent, but otherwise not solid/100% safe for reference