that will increase like a tsunami after the MOABS
then we will earn our keks!
well he raised a kid that had all the money he needed but still chose meth
so who failed here?
if he had not done that before what kind of a sloppy dictator was he?
incompetent even at stealing
kek
electrician did it
part was cheap
labor is high per hour but job was only about 1.5 hours
best way
> nefarious reasons
NOT
But since abortions are in fact LEGAL, we must exclude abortion from the Nefarious designation. I will exclude from the "Nefarious" category purely technical violations of law - which were documents in the report. I say technical becase the violations had to do only with the reimbursement formulas used, and questions whether fetal tissue "crossed state lines" which is a violation of federal law, but NOT state law, which often permits the sale and use of fetal material for reserach. A complete table of state laws may be found here: http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/embryonic-and-fetal-research-laws.aspx
Of course most of the restrictions on use of fetal material are born from the intense desire of pro life activists to make it impossible or impractical to perform abortions. This is equivalemt to complex and massive regulations which are put in place to inhibit excercise of a constituiional right (ie GUN OWNERSHIP) which is legal yet poltically unpopular among a large number of citizens.
In any event - I did exactly as Q asked and reviewed the testimony and report of the hearing on PP. The report can be seen here:
https://archives-energycommerce.house.gov/sites/republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/files/documents/Select_Investigative_Panel_Final_Report.pdf
There is NO EVIDENCE in those hearings or the report - NONE - that PP has commited acts of pedophilia, child traffing, or any other nefarious acts. Is there any evidence of this? If so the Q and any Anon who cares - please show it to us all NOW so we understand why PP "is not as it appears." This report fails to do anything like that.
I will certainly say that if clinics are PAYING women to get abortions so they can make a profit that is nefarious. But there is no evidence of that in the report. Again where is the evidence? If the report is the best evidecne Q has, then I will conclude that Q is pro life and using the Second Revoluaiotn to move to that goal. That is very different from the nefarious acts which constitute the bulk of the Q focus. A pro-choice partriot will reasonably find that wrongful. If Q has evidence that PP participates in or commits nefarious acts PLEASE PROVIDE IT so all anons are not just voting pro life w/o our consent. This is yet another issue that DIVIDES WE THE PEOPLE and takes us away from our primary goal to RESTORE LIBERTY.
LIBERTY = the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views. Emphasis on "ONE" = my way of life = my choices = I alone am morally resonsible for the excercise of my free will.
life begins at birth
before that it is just a potentiality
red the bible
genesis tells us life begins when the sould enters at birth and the first breath of life
yeah i quit going one day when the preacher said something like ride a bus with the wheels of life
great
amen
im all for it as you say
but do you insist i share your POV?
under penalty of law?
if not god bless you
if so you need to expand your thinking