Anonymous ID: c91b4d Feb. 4, 2019, 11:46 a.m. No.5027619   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7631 >>7663 >>7740

>>5027461

 

Statistics given by UCLA law school

Pic related

 

Article definitely tries to obfuscate the trnansgender enlistment to be huge, but statistics given indicate very low percentage

 

IMHO the ban is motivated not by orientation, but by medical insurance ….. sorry but if you rearrange that shit, it's not as secure as it used to be, scar tissue is brittle at contact/impact points

Plus hormone treatment would comp mental security during combat

 

Sauce https://www.williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/military-related/us-transgender-military-service/

Anonymous ID: c91b4d Feb. 4, 2019, 11:57 a.m. No.5027740   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5027619

Tho continue, if said trans/cisgender comprise around 16000, with about 7000 in active miltary enlistment, then what's the percentage across board to the enlisted active and reserve, hmmmmm? Pic from wiki but you get the picture

 

Let's be really concerned about 7000 enlisted as apposed to the more than one MILLION enlisted straight/breeder services, cuz muh optics pc bullshit