>>5029214

>>5029051

>>5029062

>>5029108

>>5029068

>>5029142

I dunno. His 4:47 (EST) timestamp is awfully Q-compatable. (For 4x7=28…JR).

Following tweet at 4:57 (For 5x7=35…JFK's #)

Prior tweet 1:36 (3x6=18…1:18…28). Or just "36 follows 35."

I think he knows and he's playing the "any press is good press" role.

>>5029358

Oh, and the delta between the 1:36 retweet and his 4:47 following tweet is 3:11…"three ones, three ones."

111 111

J K J K (two of them…"2nd JK")