Anonymous ID: 3e595a Feb. 26, 2018, 2:41 p.m. No.503927   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>503890

Stolen vehicle must've been better than a Lam. Surely it was confiscated and will endure a nice new coat of shiny green and white paint.

Anonymous ID: 3e595a Feb. 26, 2018, 3:02 p.m. No.504110   🗄️.is 🔗kun

New

Supreme Court could weaken unions by eliminating key source of their power – forced fees from government workers who don't want to join

 

Government worker unions are permitted to collect fees from non-members, according to a 1997 Supreme Court case that conservatives want overturned

High court heard a challenge to that practice Monday, fueled by 'right to work' activists who say Americans shouldn't have to pay a union they don't belong to

Public-sector unions spend millions to endorse candidates and run campaign ads, effectively lobbying voter to elect leaders who will raise their wages

But many non-members chafe at paying a union to support politicians whose policies they oppose

Supreme Court was set to overturn the law in 2016 but Justice Antonin Scalia died, leaving a 4-4 deadlock that left a lower court's pro-union ruling stand

Now conservatives hope newly minted justice Neil Gorsuch will end the debate and side with them

 

http:// www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5434757/Justices-critical-challenge-public-sector-unions.html

 

"The Trump administration is supporting Janus in his effort to persuade the court to overturn its 1977 ruling allowing states to require fair share fees for government employees."